2018
DOI: 10.4103/ijps.ijps_86_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autologous emulsified fat injection for rejuvenation of scars: A prospective observational study

Abstract: Background:The skin rejuvenation potential of the autologous emulsified nanofat was studied by Tonnard et al. in 2013. This property is due to the viable adipose-derived stem cells present in the nanofat; although, there are no viable adipocytes. The aim of this study was to determine the aesthetic outcome of autologous emulsified nanofat injection in scars using a standardised and validated Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and photographs.Materials and Methods:A total of 34 patients with scars o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1618 Most importantly, recent studies have reported a successful outcome of nanofat application in surgical procedures for facial rejuvenation and skin graft reconstruction. 1921 In addition, a condensed form of nanofat has been shown to promote wound healing and improve flap survival in a mouse model. 22,23 The present study aimed to evaluate the cell content of nanofat preparations and compare the cell yield and performance of lipoaspirate processing between mechanical disaggregation and enzymatic dissociation methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1618 Most importantly, recent studies have reported a successful outcome of nanofat application in surgical procedures for facial rejuvenation and skin graft reconstruction. 1921 In addition, a condensed form of nanofat has been shown to promote wound healing and improve flap survival in a mouse model. 22,23 The present study aimed to evaluate the cell content of nanofat preparations and compare the cell yield and performance of lipoaspirate processing between mechanical disaggregation and enzymatic dissociation methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used procedures were enzymatic SVF isolation [ 18 21 , 25 , 28 , 30 , 31 ] and nano-fat [ 22 – 24 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 32 34 ], while Wu et al [ 17 ] used spectroscopy for SVF isolation. The fatty tissue was harvested from the abdomen or multiple sites, including flanks, hips, or thighs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Centrifuged, 10 min at 800 g 5. Pellet resuspended in 15 ml Hartmann solution 2.37–9.83 × 10 7 viable cells/g of fat SVF Subcutaneous injection 19G needle 26 ± 6.22 YO 6.7 ± 4.3 YO 6 MO Bhooshan et al [ 26 ] Site : N/A Infiltration : N/A Technique : 3-mm mirrored triport Coleman’s cannula Negative pressure: manual Volume: N/A Lipoaspirate mechanically emulsified by 30–35 passes through triport connector N/A Classic nano-fat Intralesional 27G needle 32.2 ± 12 YO 3 to 204 MO (17 years); 79.4%—scars <5 years, 20.6%—scars > 5 years 3 months Gu et al [ 27 ] Site : peri-umbilically Infiltration : 20 ml of lidocaine, 0.5%, and 1 ml of 1:1000 epinephrine per 1000 ml of saline Technique : 3-mm multi-hole aspiration cannula to a 20-ml syringe Negative pressure : manual by a retracted plunger Volume : N/A 1. Saline rinsing and filtering 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent technique to process the fat to finer components (nanofat) gives more predictable results. [ 93 ]…”
Section: A Utologous F At G mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method,[ 93 ] fat is harvested either from the lower abdomen or the thigh after tumescent anesthesia. After the preparation of nanofat, it is then injected just beneath the dermis to replace lost tissue volume to get a smooth surface [ Video 4 ].…”
Section: A Utologous F At G mentioning
confidence: 99%