1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1992.tb02795.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autologous Fat Transplantation

Abstract: We present a clinical long-term follow-up of our autologous fat transplantation patients. Our study group consists of 43 patients followed over 3-48 months (mean 26 months). Cosmetic defects treated include linear morphea, expression lines, acne scars, discoid lupus erythematosus scars, and post-traumatic scarring. Postoperative complications were rare and short term. We conclude that autologous fat transplantation is a safe and effective procedure. Fat graft longevity is examined in relation to the cosmetic d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
101
0
5

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
101
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, complications such as fat reabsorption and necrosis still remain an issue occurring with a rate of 30% to 70% (11,12). Due to their inherent properties, ASCs have recently attracted an increased interest (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, complications such as fat reabsorption and necrosis still remain an issue occurring with a rate of 30% to 70% (11,12). Due to their inherent properties, ASCs have recently attracted an increased interest (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the surgeons use the proceeded material immediately after fat grafting but in literature could be found examples for graft freezing and subsequent use (Coleman WP 1999;Fulton et al, 1998;Bertossi et al, 2000) or graft enrichment with growth factors and other substances increasing the chances of graft survival (Pinski et al, 1992;Scholler et al, 2001).…”
Section: Reimplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The published survival rates of FAG are divergent, ranging from 10 to 90% (Matsudo and Toledo, 1988;Nguyen et al, 1990;Pinski and Roenigk, 1992). The following questions remain unanswered (Goldwyn, 1988): Does the fat graft survive on the face?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%