2013
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2013.40.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autologous Microvascular Breast Reconstruction

Abstract: Autologous microvascular breast reconstruction is widely accepted as a key component of breast cancer treatment. There are two basic donor sites; the anterior abdominal wall and the thigh/buttock region. Each of these regions provides for a number of flaps that are successfully utilised in breast reconstruction. Refinement of surgical technique and the drive towards minimising donor site morbidity whilst maximising flap vascularity in breast reconstruction has seen an evolution towards perforator based flap re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The widely accepted first choice for autologous breast reconstruction is the DIEP flap (Granzow et al, 2006; Healy & Ramakrishnan, 2013). The DIEP flap utilizes the laxity of the anterior abdominal wall and provides good volume for unilateral or bilateral cases and a well‐tolerated donor site (Koshima & Soeda, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widely accepted first choice for autologous breast reconstruction is the DIEP flap (Granzow et al, 2006; Healy & Ramakrishnan, 2013). The DIEP flap utilizes the laxity of the anterior abdominal wall and provides good volume for unilateral or bilateral cases and a well‐tolerated donor site (Koshima & Soeda, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insufficient donor tissue is particularly relevant, as the variability in retention often results in return trips to the operating room to harvest additional fat for grafting. Donor site morbidities may cause significant further harm to the patient 21 and complications include infection, necrosis, thrombosis, hematoma, and flap loss 22,23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical properties of the SIEA free flap are similar to those of the SCIP free flap, and when the skin flap is harvested, the muscle layer at the donor site is not damaged [ 3 ]. Therefore, SIEA flaps have excellent results in terms of healing at the donor site [ 8 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%