PurposeThe treatment of cartilage lesions remains a challenge. Matrix‐associated autologous chondrocyte implantation has evolved to become the gold standard procedure. However, this two‐step procedure has crucial disadvantages, and the one‐step minced cartilage procedure has gained attention. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of an all‐autologous minced cartilage technique in cartilage lesions at the knee joint.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, 71 patients (38.6 years ± 12.0, 39,4% female) with a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed grade III–IV cartilage defect at the medial femur condyle (n = 20), lateral femur condyle (n = 2), lateral tibia plateau (n = 1), retropatellar (n = 28) and at the trochlea (n = 20) were included. All patients were treated with an all‐autologous minced cartilage procedure (AutoCart™). Clinical knee function was evaluated by the Tegner score, visual analogue scale, the subjective and objective evaluation form of the International Knee Documentation Committee and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). MRI analyses were performed by magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) 2.0 knee score. Follow‐up examination was 13.7 ± 4.2 (12–24) months postoperative.ResultsAll clinical scores significantly improved after surgical intervention (p < 0.0001), especially the subgroup sports and recreation of KOOS showed clear changes from baseline in the follow‐up examination. In the postoperative MRI evaluation, 39 of 71 patients showed a complete fill of the cartilage defect without subchondral changes in 78% of the patients in the MOCART 2.0 score in the follow‐up analysis. None of the patients showed adverse effects, which are linked to the minced cartilage procedure during the time of follow‐up.ConclusionAn all‐autologous minced cartilage technique for chondral lesions at the knee joint seems to be an effective and safe treatment method with good clinical and radiological short‐term results.Level of EvidenceLevel IV.