1998
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b5.8023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autologous perichondral tissue for meniscal replacement

Abstract: Our aim was to examine the potential of autologous perichondral tissue to form a meniscal replacement. In 18 mature sheep we performed a complete medial meniscectomy. The animals were then divided into two groups: 12 had a meniscal replacement using strips of autologous perichondral tissue explanted from the lower rib (group G) and six (group C) served as a control group without a meniscal replacement. In all animals restriction from weight-bearing was achieved by means of transection and partial resection of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…28 Of these, only collagen scaffolds have been tested in humans to date with some promising results, 22 while the others are more preliminary with testing restricted to animal models. Any of these options or other replacement option(s) may likely emerge as viable tissue engineering options.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Of these, only collagen scaffolds have been tested in humans to date with some promising results, 22 while the others are more preliminary with testing restricted to animal models. Any of these options or other replacement option(s) may likely emerge as viable tissue engineering options.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural materials used to date are: periosteal tissue (Walsh et al, 1999); perichondral tissue (Bruns et al, 1998); small intestine submucosa (SIS) (Cook et al, 1999); acellular porcine meniscal tissue (Stapleton et al, 2008); and bacterial cellulose (Bodin et al, 2007). While these tissues have high biocompatibility, some of them cannot be employed for tissue engineering techniques as they do not allow varying structure geometry and initial mechanical properties .…”
Section: Scaffoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17][18] Such scaffolds, however, have been found to exhibit insufficient biomechanical integrity, particularly in the case of naturally derived fibers. 19,20 Scaffolds also suffer from biodegradability and biocompatibility issues, as especially seen with synthetic scaffolds. [21][22][23] Further, it has been suggested that use of any scaffolding material may hinder both cellular communication and responsiveness to external stresses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%