2001
DOI: 10.1006/fmic.2000.0390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autolytic capacity and foam analysis as additional criteria for the selection of yeast strains for sparkling wine production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Proteins and mannoproteins released by yeasts have been reported as exerting a positive effect on foam parameters [33]. Molecular exclusion HPLC of all the samples was performed for this reason ( Table 2).…”
Section: Proteins and Polysaccharidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proteins and mannoproteins released by yeasts have been reported as exerting a positive effect on foam parameters [33]. Molecular exclusion HPLC of all the samples was performed for this reason ( Table 2).…”
Section: Proteins and Polysaccharidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that the proteins and mannoproteins composition of base wines exert a major influence on their foaming properties [31,32]. Some authors have studied the influence of the different S. cerevisiae strains during the first and second fermentation of sparkling wines, as well as during the ageing period [33,34]. However, to our knowledge, there are no previous specific studies of the influence of sequential inoculation of non-Saccharomyces and S. cerevisiae during the first fermentation on the chemical composition and foaming properties of base wines in sparkling wine production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 In addition to the autolytic phenotype, fermentative capacity must be taken into account to estimate the usefulness of second fermentation yeast strains. 45 To determine the influence of the csc1-1 overexpression in the fermentative capacity of MUT10, this strain was adapted to ethanol and subsequently subjected to a second fermentation experiment with commercial base wine. EC1118 and MUT10 strains showed identical fermentation rates and total sugar depletion was reached 16 days after inoculation (Figure 3).…”
Section: Autolytic Phenotype and Fermentative Capacity Of Mut10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third procedure for accelerating autolysis, based on the use of killer yeast strains, has been proposed; however, the effect on wine quality has not been evaluated (48). Finally, several authors have suggested that autolytic yeast strains could be used as a way to improve the quality of sparkling wines by accelerating the acquisition of aging-like characteristics (27,28,46). These autolytic strains were obtained by sporulation, by random mutagenesis, or by genetic engineering of wine strains (7,16,46).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%