Formal Models and Semantics 1990
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-88074-1.50009-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automata on Infinite Objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
617
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 781 publications
(623 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
4
617
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof is similar to the proof that MSO over words defines the same class as that of regular word languages (see [Tho90]). …”
Section: Theorem 9 (Mso Characterization) a Language L Of Nested Wordsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proof is similar to the proof that MSO over words defines the same class as that of regular word languages (see [Tho90]). …”
Section: Theorem 9 (Mso Characterization) a Language L Of Nested Wordsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The automaton A R has O(s) states. Due to complexity of complementation, B R has 2 O(s log s) states and O(s) accepting constraints [Tho90].…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WMLO is a fundamental formalism and plays an important role in automata theory; moreover, temporal logics can be translated into WMLO [20].…”
Section: Model Checking For Fragments Of Logic Of Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MSO, quantification over set variables ranges over the subsets of N, in WMSO only over the finite subsets of N. Over labelled ω-orderings, WMSO and MSO have the same expressive power, which however exceeds that of FO[<]+MOD (cf. [17,13]). …”
Section: Logical Background and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%