2011 IEEE 26th Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science 2011
DOI: 10.1109/lics.2011.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automata with Group Actions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
105
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was shown in [3] for least supports and Cartesian products, and in [4] for orbit refinement. For other examples of data symmetries that satisfy these properties, see [3,4].…”
Section: Assumptions On the Data Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This was shown in [3] for least supports and Cartesian products, and in [4] for orbit refinement. For other examples of data symmetries that satisfy these properties, see [3,4].…”
Section: Assumptions On the Data Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Unlike the conference version, we use the more general notion of nominal sets, from [3], which allows more structure on data values, such as order instead of equality only.…”
Section: Progress Beyond the Conference Versionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent work on the quantitative analysis of programs [5] also uses weighted automata, but does not deal with minimization or with notions of regularity. Data languages [7] are concerned with strings over a (possibly infinite) data domain D. Recent models [3] have obtained Myhill-Nerode characterizations, and hence minimization algorithms, but the models are intended as acceptors, and not for computing more general functions. Turn-based weighted games [9] are ACRA games with a single register, and in this special setting, it is possible to solve non-negative optimal reachability in polynomial time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%