2012
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatch: Target‐binding protein design and enzyme design by automatic pinpointing potential active sites in available protein scaffolds

Abstract: Proteins perform their functions mainly via active sites, whereas other parts of the proteins comprise the scaffolds, which support the active sites. One strategy for protein functional design is transplanting active sites, such as catalytic sites for enzyme or binding hot spots for protein-protein interactions, onto a new scaffold. AutoMatch is a new program designed for efficiently elucidating suitable scaffolds and potential sites on the scaffolds. Backrub motions are used to treat backbone flexibility duri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we used the native conformation of each key residue (E99, Y160, and M161) in 2L and the solution structure of DS119 (PDB ID: 2KI0) as inputs for our grafting method. We have previously developed an efficient program, AutoMatch, for transplanting functional residues onto any protein scaffolds . With the constraints to keep the grafted residues in native conformations, AutoMatch searched for the best combination of mutagenesis sites to accommodate E, Y and M on DS119.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, we used the native conformation of each key residue (E99, Y160, and M161) in 2L and the solution structure of DS119 (PDB ID: 2KI0) as inputs for our grafting method. We have previously developed an efficient program, AutoMatch, for transplanting functional residues onto any protein scaffolds . With the constraints to keep the grafted residues in native conformations, AutoMatch searched for the best combination of mutagenesis sites to accommodate E, Y and M on DS119.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We posit that in these three proteins the key residues can sample bigger conformational space and accordingly adjust their conformations when they approach TNFα. This difference suggests we should capture this feature and incorporate more backbone motions in AutoMatch calculations in addition to the backrub motion . It may also explain why RosettaDesign can significantly improve the binding affinity for Tbab2‐4 through finer sampling of the backbone conformations …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Several approaches have been developed to generate new enzyme active sites by searching for placements of catalytically competent side-chain constellations in selected protein scaffolds or curated subsets of the Protein Data Bank containing up to several thousand protein structures. [6][7][8][9][10][11] Rosetta computational enzyme design calculations have proceeded by first generating an ideal active site, or theozyme, consisting of the reaction transition state surrounded by side-chain functional groups positioned so as to maximize transition-state stabilization. RosettaMatch is then used to search for geometrically compatible placements of these ideal active sites in protein scaffolds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The automated searching program Dezymer was developed to construct metal-binding sites for rational design of nascent metalloenzymes [ 21 , 22 ]. Other newly developed programs for matching active sites onto protein scaffolds include vector matching [ 23 ], OptGraft [ 24 ], ScaffoldSelection [ 25 ], ProdaMatch [ 26 ], AutoMatch [ 27 ], and Saber [ 28 ]. However, the actual effectiveness of these programs to generate de novo enzymes has not been confirmed by experimental validation [ 23 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%