Volume 2D: Turbomachinery 2018
DOI: 10.1115/gt2018-75184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Aerodynamic Optimization of an Aggressive S-Shaped Intermediate Compressor Duct

Abstract: As bypass-ratio in modern aero engines is continuously increasing over the last decades, the radial offset between low pressure compressor (LPC) and high pressure compressor (HPC), which needs to be overcome by the connecting s-shaped intermediate compressor duct (ICD), is getting higher. Due to performance and weight saving aspects the design of shorter and therefore more aggressive ducts has become an important research topic. In this paper an already aggressive design (with respect to current aero engines) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The new design was tested experimentally and shown to completely remove the corner separation. A similar approach is adopted by Stürzebecher et al [11] where a computational optimisation combines non-axisymmetric endwall profiling, OGVs integrated into the duct and a turning strut which builds on the work of Walker et al [12] and Wallin et al [13]. The resulting design is 19% shorter than an already aggressive baseline with no predicted increase in loss.…”
Section: Number Of Struts 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new design was tested experimentally and shown to completely remove the corner separation. A similar approach is adopted by Stürzebecher et al [11] where a computational optimisation combines non-axisymmetric endwall profiling, OGVs integrated into the duct and a turning strut which builds on the work of Walker et al [12] and Wallin et al [13]. The resulting design is 19% shorter than an already aggressive baseline with no predicted increase in loss.…”
Section: Number Of Struts 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-This method found the applications in the field of isoenergetic inviscid incompressible flow, isoenergetic isentropic compressible flow, as well as for viscous compressible flow. Sturzebecher et al [75] AutoOpti algorithm and End wall contouring -The duct was shortened up by 42% length while keeping the loss as much as low. -Implementing non-axisymmetric end wall contouring on hub and shroud wall, a 19% length reduction of the baseline duct could be further possible along with a 2% reduction in loss.…”
Section: Authors Technique Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oil-streak paint showed for rig (B) severe flow separation in the ICD hub region. In an aerodynamic optimisation by Stürzebecher et al [17] this separated ICD (B) has been stabilised with a hub endwall contouring supported by a locally bowed strut trailing edge that leads to suppression of hub-strut corner separation. To the authors knowledge this ICD is the most aggressive duct still separation free and therefore defines the current separation limit (compare Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%