2008
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.25.001181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated analysis of differential interference contrast microscopy images of the foveal cone mosaic

Abstract: An algorithm is presented for processing and analysis of differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy images of the fovea to study the cone mosaic. The algorithm automatically locates the cones and their boundaries in such images and is assessed by comparison with results from manual analysis. Additional algorithms are presented that analyze the cone positions to extract information on cone neighbor relationships as well as the short-range order and domain structure of the mosaic. The methods are applie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigation of the preferred packing arrangement of rods in the retinal periphery could add valuable information about their normal distribution in the healthy retina [4]. A third issue is that analysis was performed only along the horizontal retinal meridian; the effect of sampling windows size and orientation could be influenced by local variance of the photoreceptor mosaic as a consequence of its different expansion between the horizontal and vertical meridians [10,18,24,38,39]. If the results of the present work were extended to the vertical meridian, it is very likely that the vertical oriented windows had a higher cone density than the horizontal ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigation of the preferred packing arrangement of rods in the retinal periphery could add valuable information about their normal distribution in the healthy retina [4]. A third issue is that analysis was performed only along the horizontal retinal meridian; the effect of sampling windows size and orientation could be influenced by local variance of the photoreceptor mosaic as a consequence of its different expansion between the horizontal and vertical meridians [10,18,24,38,39]. If the results of the present work were extended to the vertical meridian, it is very likely that the vertical oriented windows had a higher cone density than the horizontal ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the foveal mosaic is a highly regular nearly crystalline lattice with predominant 1:6 (hexagonal) neighborship relations. However previous detailed packing analyses [35,36,37] have revealed lattice discontinuities represented by cone positions with < 6 > cone neighbors subdividing the hexagonal mosaic in patchy. In a rhesus monkey foveal mosaic with labeled S-cones these positions with irregular number of neighbors have been identified in a previous study [35].…”
Section: S-cone Positions Vs Irregular Positions Among the Otherwise mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Such mosaics had been previously analyzed with respect to lattice regularity [35,36,37] but there had been no approach to quantitatively study a possible relationship between S-cone positions and non-hexagonal defects of the M/L-cone lattice. In this last experiment we wanted to analyze the spatial relationships of Scones with a specific feature of foveal microarchitecture.…”
Section: S-cone Positions Vs Irregular Positions Among the Otherwise mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite individual differences in cone density and spacing, the parafoveal cone mosaic uniformly presents as a triangular lattice, and it is thought that the quality of the cone lattice is of high importance for the interreceptoral network and cell signaling (Hirsch & Miller, 1987; Pum et al , 1990; Lombardo et al , 2013b). Thus, disorder in cone packing could serve as an important and sensitive measure with which to characterize a given image of the cone mosaic (Baraas et al , 2007; Wojtas et al , 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%