2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.07.24.22277977
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated analysis of written language in the three variants of primary progressive aphasia

Abstract: Despite the important role of written language in everyday life, abnormalities in functional written communication have been sparsely investigated in Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA). Prior studies have analyzed written language separately in the three variants of PPA - nonfluent (nfvPPA), logopenic (lvPPA), and semantic (svPPA) - but have rarely compared them to each other or to spoken language. Manual analysis of written language can be a time-consuming process. We developed a program which uses a language … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous theories of compensation attributed the difficulty of making long, complex sentences to the cost of articulation. 41 However, we recently showed a high degree of similarity between the speech and writing of patients with nfvPPA 28,42 confirming previous studies showing similar patterns in patients with Broca's aphasia. 43 The similarity between writing and speaking excludes the cost of articulation to be the origin of the structural deficits in patients with nonfluent aphasia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Previous theories of compensation attributed the difficulty of making long, complex sentences to the cost of articulation. 41 However, we recently showed a high degree of similarity between the speech and writing of patients with nfvPPA 28,42 confirming previous studies showing similar patterns in patients with Broca's aphasia. 43 The similarity between writing and speaking excludes the cost of articulation to be the origin of the structural deficits in patients with nonfluent aphasia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As a result, language production in nfvPPA patients might already be at the maximum capacity for using low frequency words. 50 Lastly, the comparison between speaking and writing in nfvPPA makes it possible to further probe the functional locus of the bottleneck in language production. Our findings rule out the possibility for the articulatory stage to be the limiting factor as the same lexical and syntactic properties were found in the written samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of developing this package is to increase the precision and objectivity of language assessments while reducing human labor (as outlined in (63)). The toolbox uses a number of natural language processing toolkits and software such as Stanford Parser (64), spaCy (65), and NLTK as well as text analysis libraries in R. Quantitext receives transcribed language samples as input and generates as outputs a number of metrics such as sentence length, log word frequency, log syntax frequency (63), content units (as in (66)), efficiency of lexical and syntactic items (as in (67)), part of speech tags, and the distinction of heavy and light verbs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%