2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2015.7163806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated anatomical landmark detection ondistal femur surface using convolutional neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant differences in landmarking accuracy were found in the literature, depending on the type of medical image, inclusion criteria, dataset size, training network, image region of interest (ROI), and landmark quantity. Our results showed a relatively similar accuracy with Bier et al, Yang et al, and Li et al, which is 5.6, 5.19, and 5.59 mm, respectively. However, the present model had an inferior performance when compared with Zhang et al's 3.34 mm and Lee et al's 1.5 mm .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Significant differences in landmarking accuracy were found in the literature, depending on the type of medical image, inclusion criteria, dataset size, training network, image region of interest (ROI), and landmark quantity. Our results showed a relatively similar accuracy with Bier et al, Yang et al, and Li et al, which is 5.6, 5.19, and 5.59 mm, respectively. However, the present model had an inferior performance when compared with Zhang et al's 3.34 mm and Lee et al's 1.5 mm .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As for the inclusion criteria of training materials, some studies only used healthy subjects or the symmetric and normal medical images . The dataset size also varied between 20–40 cases, 50–70 cases, and more than 100 cases . Some studies used the pure 2D CNN, others used the 2D CNN for the 2D representations of 3D volumes, and still others used the 3D CNN directly .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prostate segmentation in MRI Liao et al (2013) Application of stacked independent subspace analysis networks Cheng et al (2016b) CNN produces energy map for 2D slice based active appearance segmentation Guo et al (2016) Stacked sparse auto-encoders extract features from patches, input to atlas matching and a deformable model Milletari et al (2016b) 3D U-net based CNN architecture with objective function that directly optimizes Dice coefficient, ranks #5 in PROMISE12 Yu et al (2017) 3D fully convolutional network, hybrid between a ResNet and U-net architecture, ranks #1 on PROMISE12 Chen et al (2015c) CT Vertebrae localization; joint learning of vertebrae appearance and dependency on neighbors using CNN Roth et al (2015c) CT Sclerotic metastases detection; random 2D views are analyzed by CNN and aggregated Shen et al (2015a) CT Vertebrae localization and segmentation; CNN for segmenting vertebrae and for center detection Suzani et al (2015) MRI Vertebrae localization, identification and segmentation of vertebrae; CNN used for initial localization Yang et al (2015) MRI Anatomical landmark detection; uses CNN for slice classification for presence of landmark Antony et al (2016) X-ray Osteoarthritis grading; pre-trained ImageNet CNN fine-tuned on knee X-rays Cai et al (2016b) CT, MRI Vertebrae localization; RBM determines position, orientation and label of vertebrae Golan et al (2016) US Hip dysplasia detection; CNN with adversarial component detects structures and performs measurements Korez et al (2016) MRI Vertebral bodies segmentation; voxel probabilities obtained with a 3D CNN are input to deformable model Jamaludin et al (2016) MRI Automatic spine scoring; VGG-19 CNN analyzes vertebral discs and finds lesion hotspots Miao et al (2016) X-ray Total Knee Arthroplasty kinematics by real-time 2D/3D registration using CNN Roth et al (2016c) CT Posterior-element fractures detection; CNN for 2.5D patch-based analysiš Stern et al (2016) MRI Hand age estimation; 2D regression CNN analyzes 13 bones Forsberg et al (2017) MRI Vertebrae detection and labeling; outputs of two CNNs are input to graphical model Spampinato et al (2017) X-ray Skeletal bone age assessment; comparison among several deep learning approaches for the task at hand A surprising number of complete applications with promising results are available; one that stands out is Jamaludin et al (2016) who trained their system with 12K discs and claimed near-human performances across four different radiological scoring ta...…”
Section: Musculoskeletalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve 3D data parsing with deep learning algorithms, several approaches have been proposed that treat the 3D space as a composition of 2D orthogonal planes. Yang et al (2015) identified landmarks on the distal femur surface by processing three independent sets of 2D MRI slices (one for each plane) with regular CNNs. The 3D position of the landmark was defined as the intersection of the three 2D slices with the highest classification output.…”
Section: Detection 321 Organ Region and Landmark Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%