Automated Assessment and Microlearning Units as Predictors of At-Risk Students and Students’ Outcomes in the Introductory Programming Courses

Abstract

<jats:p>The number of students who decided to study information technology related study programs is continually increasing. Introductory programming courses represent the most crucial milestone in information technology education and often reflect students’ ability to think abstractly and systematically, solve problems, and design their solutions. Even though many students who attend universities have already completed some introductory courses of programming, there is still a large group of students with limited programming skills. This drawback often increases during the first term, and it is often the main reason why students leave study too early. There is a myriad of technologies and tools which can be involved in the programming course to increase students’ chances of mastering programming. The introductory programming courses used in this study has been gradually extended over the four academic years with the automated source code assessment of students’ programming assignments followed by the implementation of a set of suitably designed microlearning units. The final four datasets were analysed to confirm the suitability of automated assessment and microlearning units as predictors of at-risk students and students’ outcomes in the introductory programming courses. The research results proved the significant contribution of automated code assessment in students’ learning outcomes in the elementary topics of learning programming. Simultaneously, it proved a moderate to strong dependence between the students’ activity and achievement in the activities and final students’ outcomes.</jats:p>

Towards Predicting Student’s Dropout in University Courses Using Different Machine Learning Techniques

“…One of the hottest research topics in learning analytics has been predicting the probability of students completing or failing a course, especially from the very early weeks [13], as well as EDM [14]. Once a reliable performance prediction is available, it can be used in many contexts to identify weak students and provide feedback to students or predict students' failure [15].…”

Conceptual Framework for Programming Skills Development Based on Microlearning and Automated Source Code Evaluation in Virtual Learning Environment

“…Skalka & Drlik [47] concluded that AA does not degrade students' results, but its significant improvement in them was not proved. More detailed research by the same researchers [4] has shown that the use of AA in the introductory lessons of programming courses led to significant student outcomes differences. The initial topics, such as input/output, variables, data types, nested loops, arrays, exceptions, files, etc., cover essential issues.…”

“…The H1 hypothesis requires a comparison of students' results measured by two tests. The tests were focused on the practical experience of students and consisted of several (3)(4)(5) assignments that covered the entire content of the first or second half of the course content.…”

“…Although the application of the framework did not bring significant benefits in the introductory programming course, students perceive the use of microlearning and automatically evaluated program codes positively. Based on the already published results of the questionnaire aimed at finding out the student's attitudes [4], it can be stated that:…”

“…An unfortunate consequence of applying this one-size-fits-all approach to education in cases where the students have different levels of skill and knowledge is a natural reduction in student numbers during the first months of study. Many authors have estimated that the student dropout rate is about 30-40% [2][3][4].…”