Automated Auditory Brainstem Response Testing for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening

Erenberg, Sheryl R.

doi:10.1016/s0030-6665(05)70190-0

Cited by 14 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This may explain our lower rate of failed screening tests compared with that typically reported in the literature for a single modality screening protocol (6% vs. 9%–26%). 12–15 Presumably, debris in the ear canals or fluid in the middle ear cleft had time to resolve after birth and did not elevate the false‐negative rate of hearing screening. The patients with conductive HL are clearly not otherwise normal infants with a middle ear effusion that might be expected to clear spontaneously.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neonatal Hearing Loss in the Indigent

et al. 2002

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neonatal Hearing Loss in the Indigent

et al. 2002

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Intervention begins before 6 months of age, substantially preceding the speed and language skills of children. 1 Results Moderate to profound HL were found in fourteen ears (58%) of patients with microcephaly. Moderate to profound HL (28%) and endocochlear damage (15%) were found in the ears of patients with microcephaly and delayed speech.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in children with microcephaly

Mangunatmadja¹,

Widodo²,

Pusponegoro³

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Hearing loss (HL) is commonly found in childrenwith microcephaly. The aim of this study was to reveal hearing lossand auditory brainstem pathways disorders in children with micro-cephaly and other handicaps.Methods There were 194 children who were referred for hearingevaluation. Subjects with history of congenital perinatal infection(TORCH) were excluded. Data were collected from the results ofBrainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials (BAEP) recordings, includ-ing sex, age, clinical manifestations, latency and interlatency be-tween waves I, III, V, and the hearing levels of each ear.Results Moderate to profound HL were found in fourteen ears(58%) of patients with microcephaly. Moderate to profound HL (28%)and endocochlear damage (15%) were found in the ears of pa-tients with microcephaly and delayed speech. Moderate to pro-found HL (39%) and endocochlear damage (11%) were detectedin the ears of patients with microcephaly and delayed develop-ment. Moderate to profound HL (21%) and endocochlear damage(16%) were found in the ears of microcephalic patients with bothdelayed speech and delayed development. Moderate to profoundHL (26%) and endocochlear damage (32%) were detected in theears of patients with microcephaly and cerebral palsy.Conclusion This study revealed the importance of early HL de-tection in microcephalic patients especially those with other handi-caps such as delayed speech, delayed development, and cere-bral palsy

show abstract

“…Congenital hearing loss is one of the major birth abnormalities in newborns where the incidence is estimated to be 1-3 per 1000 live births in well-baby nursery newborns and nearly 2-4 per 100 infants in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) babies. [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 ]…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%