2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated calculation of surface energy fluxes with high-frequency lake buoy data

Abstract: Lake Heat Flux Analyzer is a program used for calculating the surface energy fluxes in lakes according to established literature methodologies. The program was developed in MATLAB for the rapid analysis of high-frequency data from instrumented lake buoys in support of the emerging field of aquatic sensor network science. To calculate the surface energy fluxes, the program requires a number of input variables, such as air and water temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and short-wave radiation. Available … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We further exclude flow distortion and an associated higher proportion of upward winds and overestimated H to be the reason, as we filtered the fluxes appropriately (Text S1). Woolway et al () have discussed the risk of underestimating turbulent fluxes across the air‐water interface for lakes by classical bulk transfer models for oceans, as they do not account for lake‐specific conditions such as wind variation caused by sheltering and fetch limitation of wind (for example, Schladow et al, ). Furthermore, the atmospheric boundary layer stratification over lakes is more variable due to stronger heating and cooling by the adjacent land surface and lower U (Verburg & Antenucci, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We further exclude flow distortion and an associated higher proportion of upward winds and overestimated H to be the reason, as we filtered the fluxes appropriately (Text S1). Woolway et al () have discussed the risk of underestimating turbulent fluxes across the air‐water interface for lakes by classical bulk transfer models for oceans, as they do not account for lake‐specific conditions such as wind variation caused by sheltering and fetch limitation of wind (for example, Schladow et al, ). Furthermore, the atmospheric boundary layer stratification over lakes is more variable due to stronger heating and cooling by the adjacent land surface and lower U (Verburg & Antenucci, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the coefficients were calculated for our specific measurement height and are thus site specific, we additionally estimated the coefficients in the reference height of 10 m ( C H 10 and C E 10 ) following Xiao et al () from linear regression involving U at 10‐m height ( U 10 ). For an estimation of the roughness length z 0 , which was needed for the standard logarithmic wind law (neutral stability assumption) in order to estimate U 10 , we applied the flux gradient relations for momentum with stability classes as described in Woolway et al (). The drag coefficient for momentum ( C D ) was estimated as slope of the regression of the square of U versus the square of friction velocity ( u * ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, we followed the methods of Woolway et al (2015b) and estimated K d as a function of secchi depth (z secchi ) as: K d = 1.75/ z secchi . An average z secchi was estimated from monthly averaged observations from Võrtsjärv.…”
Section: Lake Temperature Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%