2016 International Conference on Next Generation Intelligent Systems (ICNGIS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icngis.2016.7854063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated cashew kernel grading using machine vision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall minimum accuracy of all the models was 95.1%. A study was done by Aran et al, (2016) to find out the effect of different features in the grading of the cashew kernel. In this study, colour, texture, shape and size features were extracted and tested on five different classification algorithms (i.e., Random Forest, Multilayer Perception, Multi-class classifier, Regression and Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN)).…”
Section: Figure 1 Cashew Production In Tanzania Between 2014 and 2020...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall minimum accuracy of all the models was 95.1%. A study was done by Aran et al, (2016) to find out the effect of different features in the grading of the cashew kernel. In this study, colour, texture, shape and size features were extracted and tested on five different classification algorithms (i.e., Random Forest, Multilayer Perception, Multi-class classifier, Regression and Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN)).…”
Section: Figure 1 Cashew Production In Tanzania Between 2014 and 2020...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different colour features were extracted from the captured images and the features that were extracted in this experiment include the means (μ), standard deviations (σ), and skewness (γ) of the red (R), green (G) and blue (B) channels from the RGB colour space, the hue (H), saturated (S) and value (V) channels from the HSV colour space, the excess blue (2B-G-R), excess green (2G-R-B) and excess red (2R-G-B). The mean (μ), standard deviation (σ), and skewness (γ) of the pixels in the image were calculated using the following equations, respectively (Aran et al, 2016).…”
Section: Feature Extraction and Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, higher accuracy and lesser execution time were found for the SGD model and SVM model respectively. In the study, 64 an automated system was proposed for cashew nuts grading according to their texture, color, size, and shape features. Five ML classifiers were deployed to compare the classification performance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest methods of classifying cashew kernels are based on their color or texture and a single layer neural network [20,21]. Aran et al [22] extended this work by testing external features like color, texture, shape and size. In addition, they analyzed the impact of some image preprocessing methods on cashew nut classification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%