2015 International Conference on Computing and Network Communications (CoCoNet) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/coconet.2015.7411260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated cervical cancer detection through RGVF segmentation and SVM classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SVM classifiers are used to validate the accuracy of classification 24,51‐53 . The Kernel used for the classification is represented as in Equation ) k()x,y=e()xy22σ2 where σ denotes the kernel width of the Gaussian kernel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVM classifiers are used to validate the accuracy of classification 24,51‐53 . The Kernel used for the classification is represented as in Equation ) k()x,y=e()xy22σ2 where σ denotes the kernel width of the Gaussian kernel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature [52] collected a total of 121 features comprising 5 shape descriptor, 50 textures, 66 ripplet descriptors and applied an ensemble classification using weighted majority voting. Literature [53] divided the image into blocks with certain size and extracted the texture and color histogram features which show significant differences between blocks with and without suspicious cells, then these features are input into the support vector machine for classification. Literature [54] used Radiating Gradient Vector Flow Snake to segment the single cervical image into cytoplasm, nucleus and background, then cellular and nuclei features are extracted for the training of Support Vector Machine (SVM), artificial neural networks (ANN) and Euclidean distance-based system to classify seven different types of cells.…”
Section: ) Comparison Of Feature Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature [55] used the fuzzy C-means (FCM) to segment the single cell images and tested on 5 classifiers including Bayesian classifier, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), artificial neural networks (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM) with nucleus-based and cell-based features. Among the 4 methods, the accuracy of literature [53] is 80.92% and the number of features is 11. The recognition accuracy of this paper is 0.4% higher and the number of features is reduced by 2.…”
Section: ) Comparison Of Feature Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many automated [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and semi-automated [14] systems have been proposed in the last 10 years. Some have worked on a single cell, and some have worked on multiple cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%