2016 IEEE 20th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/edocw.2016.7584349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Change Planning for Differential Update IT Systems with State Constraint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to those works, in our previous work [8]- [10], we chose state-space search for making it possible to explicitly deal with system states and easily taking global constraints (cf. [12]) into account.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to those works, in our previous work [8]- [10], we chose state-space search for making it possible to explicitly deal with system states and easily taking global constraints (cf. [12]) into account.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that our declarative system update tool uses high-level models to hide details of states, transitions and dependencies. For example, the component model [9], [10] is proposed, which consists of system components, connections between them, and property of them. In this model, the model encapsulates the details of components and connections, and are converted into a detailed model that corresponds to the state model.…”
Section: Modeling Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%