1992
DOI: 10.21236/ada256932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Classification of Basic-Level Terrain Features in Digital Elevation Models

Abstract: Destroy this report when no longer needed. Do not return it to the originator.The findings in this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorized documents.The citation in this report of trade names of commercially available products does not constitute official endorsement or approval of the use of such products.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of geomorphometric field variables to identify landform classes and features dates back over four decades (Wilson, 2012). Over the last twenty years, several methods have been developed to automate the extraction of land surface features from DEMs (e.g Graff and Usery (1993), Miliaresis and Argialas (1999), Dymond et al (1995), Wood (1996), Schmidt and Hewitt (2004), Dragut and Blaschke (2006)). Several widely applied approaches to automated classification of land surface elements are based on consideration of local surface shape as measured by slope gradient and signs or values of curvatures (MacMillan and Shary, 2009).…”
Section: The Analysis Of the Land Surface Using Digital Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of geomorphometric field variables to identify landform classes and features dates back over four decades (Wilson, 2012). Over the last twenty years, several methods have been developed to automate the extraction of land surface features from DEMs (e.g Graff and Usery (1993), Miliaresis and Argialas (1999), Dymond et al (1995), Wood (1996), Schmidt and Hewitt (2004), Dragut and Blaschke (2006)). Several widely applied approaches to automated classification of land surface elements are based on consideration of local surface shape as measured by slope gradient and signs or values of curvatures (MacMillan and Shary, 2009).…”
Section: The Analysis Of the Land Surface Using Digital Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have been trying to measure and standardize mountain peaks for at least the past 120 years [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Defining a peak is a conceptual problem that requires a certain level of abstraction which is an essential part of the model, and which should have subsequent feasibility for the applicable automation process.…”
Section: Semantics Definitions Conception and Standardizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(A) Most of the developed automated techniques concentrate on the detection or classification of whole mountains or mountain ranges, e.g., the algorithms for feature-matching [3], the componentlabeling algorithm applied to the mountain terrain class [17], a local histograms analysis [25], and mathematical-morphological based algorithms [16].…”
Section: Morphometric Algorithms Based On a Digital Elevation Model (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land components can be mapped by studying topographical maps, interpreting aerial photographs (Speight 1977) and making field measurements (Graff & Usery 1993). Such terrain analysis techniques are considered to be an art without formal theory and often rely on the interpreter's implicit terrain-related knowledge of the area being studied (Irvin, Ventura & Slater 1997).…”
Section: Terrain Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%