DOI: 10.4995/thesis/10251/130202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Contingency Management in Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Abstract: Technological development and scientific research are steadily enabling higher levels of automation in the global industry. In the aerospace sector, the operation of Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) is a clear example. Given the huge potential of the UAS market, Civil Aviation Authorities are elaborating a new regulatory framework for the safe integration of UAS into the civil airspace. The general goal is ensuring that the operation of UAS has an Equivalent Level of Safety (ELOS) to that of manned aviation. To … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 69 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this simplistic user-oriented design, enabled by the mainly qualitative nature of SORA, demands human involvement from both the operator and the approving authority sides, which makes it challenging to automate SORA and does not encourage using optimization techniques to reduce the risks when the desired risk class is already achieved (although, SORA allows, under certain circumstances, to use quantitative methodologies to claim reduction of the risk class of the operation). On the other side of the spectrum, there exist quantitative solutions for risk estimation, such as High-fidelity risk modeling (HFRM) [60,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,61,62,58]. HFRM concentrates on estimating the Expected Fatality Rate (EFR) resulting from the operation (the ground risk EFR should not exceed one fatality per one million flight hours, and the air risk EFR should not exceed one mid-air collision per 10 million flight hours [71]).…”
Section: Risks Arising From Uav Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this simplistic user-oriented design, enabled by the mainly qualitative nature of SORA, demands human involvement from both the operator and the approving authority sides, which makes it challenging to automate SORA and does not encourage using optimization techniques to reduce the risks when the desired risk class is already achieved (although, SORA allows, under certain circumstances, to use quantitative methodologies to claim reduction of the risk class of the operation). On the other side of the spectrum, there exist quantitative solutions for risk estimation, such as High-fidelity risk modeling (HFRM) [60,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,61,62,58]. HFRM concentrates on estimating the Expected Fatality Rate (EFR) resulting from the operation (the ground risk EFR should not exceed one fatality per one million flight hours, and the air risk EFR should not exceed one mid-air collision per 10 million flight hours [71]).…”
Section: Risks Arising From Uav Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%