Automated conversational agents for post-intervention follow-up: a systematic review

Abstract

Background Advances in natural language processing and other machine learning techniques have led to the development of automated agents (chatbots) that mimic human conversation. These systems have mainly been used in commercial settings, and within medicine, for symptom checking and psychotherapy. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the acceptability and implementation success of chatbots in the follow-up of patients who have undergone a physical healthcare intervention. Methods A systematic review of MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-process, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, CENTRAL and the grey literature using a PRISMA-compliant methodology up to September 2020 was conducted. Abstract screening and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Risk of bias and quality assessments were performed for each study. Results The search identified 904 studies of which 10 met full inclusion criteria: three randomised control trials, one non-randomised clinical trial and six cohort studies. Chatbots were used for monitoring after the management of cancer, hypertension and asthma, orthopaedic intervention, ureteroscopy and intervention for varicose veins. All chatbots were deployed on mobile devices. A number of metrics were identified and ranged from a 31 per cent chatbot engagement rate to a 97 per cent response rate for system-generated questions. No study examined patient safety. Conclusion A range of chatbot builds and uses was identified. Further investigation of acceptability, efficacy and mechanistic evaluation in outpatient care pathways may lend support to implementation in routine clinical care.

Curious thing, an artificial intelligence (AI)-based conversational agent for COVID-19 patient management

“…Limited evidence is available on the effectiveness and usability of AI-based conversational agents in health care (Milne-Ives et al 2020;Schachner et al 2020;Tudor Car et al 2020;Geoghegan et al 2021). No clear guidelines or validated models are available for the monitoring of COVID-19 patients in the community, in order to identify the deterioration in patient medical symptoms.…”

A Surgical Perspective on Large Language Models

“…AI is a broad term describing the process of replicating the rationality of intelligent human thought, actions, or tasks with a machine or digital technology 8,9 . It is not the same as automation, which is commonly used in surgical automated conversational agents to date 1 . In AI, with training, the machine can analyze, adapt, and learn from data.…”

Reply to "Optimizing intraoral surgery video recording for residents’ training during the COVID-19 pandemic: Comparison of 3 point of views using a GoPro”

“…The authors build on previous work, 6 which appears to have been used in the new BAD guidelines. 7 We would be interested in a further analysis with the types reported as in the updated RCPath guidelines, which might further clarify the BCC types that should be treated with greater caution to inform further guideline updates.…”

“…tive approach to lower limb lymphedema after groin dissectionpreliminary evidence. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (6)…”

“…Whilst ChatBot's are commonplace in fin-tech, sales, customer relationship management and retail, use within the field of healthcare is relatively new. 6 We describe the early adoption and case use of a ChatBot to support clinical decision-making support for free flap monitoring -the 'FlapBot'.…”