Objective. To assess the consistency of automated measurements of coronary artery calcification (CAC) burden and emphysema extent on computed tomography (CT) images acquired with different scanners and radiation dose protocols in a lung cancer screening (LCS) population. Materials and Methods. The analysis included two LCS cohorts, named inter-scanner cohort, whose subjects underwent two consecutive screening rounds with two different dual-source CT scanners, and inter-dose cohort, whose subjects underwent a low-dose CT scan and an ultra-low dose CT scan. Exclusion criteria for CAC measurements were software failure, previous history of CVD and/or of coronary stenting, whereas for emphysema assessment software failure only. CT images were retrospectively analyzed by a fully automated AI software for CAC scoring, using three predefined Agatston score categories (0-99, 100-399, and ≥ 400), and emphysema quantification, using the percentage of low attenuation areas (%LAA). Demographic and clinical data were obtained from the written questionnaire completed by each participant at the first visit. Agreement for CAC and %LAA categories was measured by the k-Cohen Index with Fleiss-Cohen weights (Kw) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI). Results. In the inter-scanner cohort, an overlap of CAC strata was observed in 218/245 (90%) volunteers with an almost perfect agreement (Kw= 0.91, 95%CI 0.88-0.95), while an overlap of %LAA strata in 182/256 (71%) volunteers, with a substantial agreement (Kw= 0.70, 95%CI 0.63-0.76). In the inter-dose cohort, an overlap of CAC strata was observed in 275/327 (84%) volunteers, with an almost perfect agreement (Kw= 0.86, 95%CI 0.82-0.90), while an overlap of %LAA strata was found in 204/356 (57%) volunteers, with a moderate agreement (Kw= 0.57, 95%CI 0.51-0.63). Conclusion. Automated CAC and emphysema quantification showed consistent results when applied on CT images acquired with different scanners and different radiation dose CT protocols in two LCS cohorts.