2021
DOI: 10.3390/aerospace8020030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Defect Detection and Decision-Support in Gas Turbine Blade Inspection

Abstract: Background—In the field of aviation, maintenance and inspections of engines are vitally important in ensuring the safe functionality of fault-free aircrafts. There is value in exploring automated defect detection systems that can assist in this process. Existing effort has mostly been directed at artificial intelligence, specifically neural networks. However, that approach is critically dependent on large datasets, which can be problematic to obtain. For more specialised cases where data are sparse, the image … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a need to support human decision making during inspection [ 100 , 158 , 159 ]. The challenge is integrating human operators and inspection software.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a need to support human decision making during inspection [ 100 , 158 , 159 ]. The challenge is integrating human operators and inspection software.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, a second set of images was taken of the now cleaned blades with the same camera setup and settings. For the image acquisition, we used the same set-up as in [ 100 ]. This comprised a self-made light tent and three LED ring-lights (LSY 6W manufactured by Superlux, Auckland, New Zealand) placed on the left and right side and on the top of the light tent for optimal illumination.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first task (screenbased inspection), images of the blades were shown to the participants. Those images were taken in a self-developed light tent with surround lighting as per [22]. In the full vision and visual-tactile inspection tasks, the actual parts were presented and handed out, respectively, to the participants.…”
Section: Research Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The verification was done by using a software that measures the defect size visible on the photograph (in pixels) for each view [93]. The results were than compared and a ranking was made based on the visible defect size.…”
Section: Defect View Scalementioning
confidence: 99%