2015
DOI: 10.1109/tifs.2015.2414392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Depression Diagnosis Based on Facial Dynamic Analysis and Sparse Coding

Abstract: Depression is a severe psychiatric disorder preventing a person from functioning normally in both work and daily lives. Currently, diagnosis of depression requires extensive participation from clinical experts. It has drawn much attention to develop an automatic system for efficient and reliable diagnosis of depression. Under the influence of depression, visual-based behavior disorder is readily observable. This paper presents a novel method of exploring facial region visual-based nonverbal behavior analysis f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RMSE MAE Baseline [22] 13.61 10.88 LPQ + SVR [45] 10.82 8.97 PHOG [30] 10.45 N/A MHH + EOH + LBP [25] 11.19 9.14 LPQ-TOP + MFA [33] 10.27 8.22 LPQ + Geo [46] 9.72 7.86 Two DCNN [10] 9.82 7.58 C3D Tight-Face [44] 9.64 7.50 C3D Loose-Face [44] 10.04 8.15 RNN-C3D Combined Faces [44] 9.28 7.37 C3D Global + 3D-GAP (Ours) 9.24 7.10 C3D Local + 3D-GAP (Ours) 8.37 6.51 C3D Global and Local + 3D-GAP (Ours) 8.26 6.40 [36] 10.50 8.44 LGBP-TOP + LPQ [37] 10.27 8.20 Two DCNN [10] 9.55 7.47 VGG + FDHH [38] 8.04 6.68 C3D Tight-Face [44] 9.66 7.48 C3D Loose-Face [44] 9.81 7.73 RNN-C3D Combined Faces [44] 9.20 7.22 C3D Global + 3D-GAP (Ours) 8.97 7.09 C3D Local + 3D-GAP (Ours) 8.55 6.81 C3D Global and Local + 3D-GAP (Ours) 8.31 6.59…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…RMSE MAE Baseline [22] 13.61 10.88 LPQ + SVR [45] 10.82 8.97 PHOG [30] 10.45 N/A MHH + EOH + LBP [25] 11.19 9.14 LPQ-TOP + MFA [33] 10.27 8.22 LPQ + Geo [46] 9.72 7.86 Two DCNN [10] 9.82 7.58 C3D Tight-Face [44] 9.64 7.50 C3D Loose-Face [44] 10.04 8.15 RNN-C3D Combined Faces [44] 9.28 7.37 C3D Global + 3D-GAP (Ours) 9.24 7.10 C3D Local + 3D-GAP (Ours) 8.37 6.51 C3D Global and Local + 3D-GAP (Ours) 8.26 6.40 [36] 10.50 8.44 LGBP-TOP + LPQ [37] 10.27 8.20 Two DCNN [10] 9.55 7.47 VGG + FDHH [38] 8.04 6.68 C3D Tight-Face [44] 9.66 7.48 C3D Loose-Face [44] 9.81 7.73 RNN-C3D Combined Faces [44] 9.20 7.22 C3D Global + 3D-GAP (Ours) 8.97 7.09 C3D Local + 3D-GAP (Ours) 8.55 6.81 C3D Global and Local + 3D-GAP (Ours) 8.31 6.59…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cummins et al [30] investigated the use of two different descriptors which are called Space-Time Interest Points (STIP) [31] and Pyramid of Histogram of Gradients (PHOG) [32], with PHOG demonstrating better accuracy. Lingyun Wen et al [33] proposed extracting dynamic feature descriptors based on LPQ from Three Orthogonal Planes (LPQ-TOP). Sparse coding is then applied to organize the feature descriptors, and SVR allows predicting the levels of depression level.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 2, the performance of our proposed method is compared with state-of-the-art methods on AVEC2013 dataset. The methods in [17,18,19,20,21] are based on handcrafted features. For instance, Local Phase Quantization (LPQ) is employed as baseline method in AVEC2013 competition [17].…”
Section: Experimental Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their experiments, PHOG has shown better results than STIPs. In our previous work [185], the temporal dynamic is captured by the LPQ-TOP features from facial region sub-volumes. Then a behavior pattern dictionary is learned through sparse coding schemes.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chapter 7. Computational Depression Diagnosis Analysis using Deep Learning Approach 129 Methods RMSE MAE Baseline [178] 13.61 10.88 team-australia [168] 10.45 N/A Uni-Ulm [167] 11.19 9.14 Wen [185] 10 tively. It can be seen from the table that, when joint tuning is applied, the MAE and RMSE obtained are 7.58 and 9.82 respectively on AVEC2013 database.…”
Section: Overall Performance By Fusing the Individual Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%