2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated detection of atrial fibrillation using Bayesian paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In literature, except the discussed methods in medical research, various other methods for CAD classification have been developed using other learning and data mining techniques, for instance, random forest [ 48 , 49 ], decision tree [ 50 , 51 ], clustering [ 52 , 53 ], and Gaussian mixture model [ 54 ].…”
Section: Methodology Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, except the discussed methods in medical research, various other methods for CAD classification have been developed using other learning and data mining techniques, for instance, random forest [ 48 , 49 ], decision tree [ 50 , 51 ], clustering [ 52 , 53 ], and Gaussian mixture model [ 54 ].…”
Section: Methodology Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be found that the performance of the NBC is generally lower than other classifiers. [17,18] Pourbabaee and Lucas [17] have proposed three different classifiers to identify the AFIB that are kNN, ANN and Naive Bayesian by using the beat information and power spectral density. This research shows that among the AFIB classifiers, kNN provides the highest AFIB detection accuracy of 93.75% compared with ANN and Naive Bayesian, which have 87.50% and 75.00% of accuracy, respectively.…”
Section: Naive Bayesian Classifier (Nbc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research shows that among the AFIB classifiers, kNN provides the highest AFIB detection accuracy of 93.75% compared with ANN and Naive Bayesian, which have 87.50% and 75.00% of accuracy, respectively. In the paper of Joy et al, [18] he has proposed Naive Bayesian and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) to classify AFIB. It is discovered that GMM provides slightly higher performance in all sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy compared with Naive Bayesian, However, all of them still have the accuracy of 99.00% and above.…”
Section: Naive Bayesian Classifier (Nbc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the dominant frequency has been shown to be a distinctive feature for AF detection. In another ECG-based pattern analysis method for the classification of normal sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation (AF) beats [13], the denoised and registered ECG beats were subjected to independent component analysis (ICA) for data reduction, and the ICA weights were used as features for classification using Naive Bayes and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) classifiers. All of these methods use handcraft features for pattern recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%