2018 2nd International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icisc.2018.8399036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated detection of fighting styles using localized action features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second phase, the activity is recognized based on the extracted features [18]. The fight action recognition framework proposed in [19] used a bag of words for feature extraction and K-nearest neighbors for classification. The model achieved an accuracy of 86% using the k-th video dataset.…”
Section: Trajectory-based Methods For Violence Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the second phase, the activity is recognized based on the extracted features [18]. The fight action recognition framework proposed in [19] used a bag of words for feature extraction and K-nearest neighbors for classification. The model achieved an accuracy of 86% using the k-th video dataset.…”
Section: Trajectory-based Methods For Violence Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature extraction Classification Accuracy % [19] Begs of words (BoW) k-NN 86 [20] Gaussian mixture method (GMM) Rule-based 90 [21] Region Vector Motion (RVM) SVM 96 [18] Motion boundary histograms (MBH) SVM 89 [22] Local motion feature (LMF) SVM 85…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional Methods Machine Learning [37] SVM [28,44,19,46] Others [49,46] Handcrafted Features [11,93] Motion Patterns and Optical Flow [11,29,15,47,10,97,23…”
Section: Violence Detection Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%