2015
DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2014.2325997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Detection of Sleep Apnea and Hypopnea Events Based on Robust Airflow Envelope Tracking in the Presence of Breathing Artifacts

Abstract: The paper presents a new approach to detection of apnea/hypopnea events, in the presence of artifacts and breathing irregularities, from a single-channel airflow record. The proposed algorithm, based on a robust envelope detector, identifies segments of signal affected by a high amplitude modulation corresponding to apnea/hypopnea events. It is shown that a robust airflow envelope-free of breathing artifacts-improves effectiveness of the diagnostic process and allows one to localize the beginning and the end o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the recent years, several studies have focused on automated detection of sleep apnea events based exclusively on the analysis of a single respiratory signal. Many studies used the thermal oronasal airflow sensors to build classical machine learning methods [ 34 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 44 , 74 , 75 , 76 ] while others used the nasal pressure signal [ 11 , 17 , 35 , 43 , 45 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 ]. Although being much less widely explored, the use of respiratory wearable belts in automated detection of sleep apnea also showed very good results [ 73 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the recent years, several studies have focused on automated detection of sleep apnea events based exclusively on the analysis of a single respiratory signal. Many studies used the thermal oronasal airflow sensors to build classical machine learning methods [ 34 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 44 , 74 , 75 , 76 ] while others used the nasal pressure signal [ 11 , 17 , 35 , 43 , 45 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 ]. Although being much less widely explored, the use of respiratory wearable belts in automated detection of sleep apnea also showed very good results [ 73 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, robust classifiers were used to discriminate between the classes of apnea and non-apnea segments. Examples of classification algorithms that have been used with respiratory signals include threshold-based detectors [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ], support vector machines (SVM) [ 39 , 40 ], artificial neural networks (ANN) [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ], as well as linear discriminant analysis (LDA) combined with regression trees (CART) and the boosting algorithm AdaBoost (AB) [ 45 ].…”
Section: Background and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard way to diagnose sleep apnea is polysomnography (PSG), this test includes direct observation of the patient, along with electroencephalogram (EEG) control hypertension, breathing rhythm, heart rhythm, oxygen saturation, eye movements and muscles' electric actions. This test is used to discriminate central, obstructive or mixed apnea and calculates the apnea-hypopnea index by dividing the sum of apneas by the hours of sleep [11]. However, this device is too costly and its interpretation requires experts and it is not available everywhere [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apnoea events in standard sleep studies are readily recognised by human-based scoring and some machine-learning-based apnoea-detectors [61][62][63][64] simply by gross reductions in airflow. These automated apnoea detectors typically work by identifying changes in respiratory activity at the event level, and as such, are optimised for estimating the AHI, for which they achieve moderate to high success [65].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Physiological Signals In Advanced Sleep Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional assessment of sleep studies relies upon manual scoring of events, where a trained expert scorer utilises information from multiple associated channels within a polysomnogram, and in conjunction with deductive reasoning, can identify and label relevant events. Experimental machinebased alternatives to traditional sleep scoring are being developed with algorithms that are excellent at objective pattern recognition [62,65,204]. However, they are limited by their training experience and inability to extrapolate sensibly outside these bounds [205].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Airflow Obstruction Measures With Manual Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%