2011
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.177.76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Determination and On-Line Correction of Emissivity Coefficient in Controlled Cooling of Drop Forgings

Abstract: The paper presents the methodology of determination of emissivity coefficient of steel in the direct cooling temperature range, which allow self-definition of this parameter in automated temperature control system used for direct cooling of drop-forged parts. Based on the actual temperature of the surface of the workpiece, the system automatically adjusts the velocity of fan-forced air to produce desired cooling rate and course of cooling curves. To enable automatic correction of cooling rate, the system must … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In forging tests, conducted on a hydraulic press of capacity 5 MN at working speed 20 mm/s, which for flat billet resulted in strain rate corresponding to its average level observed during soft blows of hammer forging of the part concerned, forged specimens of square cross-section 30×30 mm were deformed with true strain 0,48. After hot deformation the specimens were subject to controlled cooling with accelerated air with and without mist, varying increased cooling rate, realized in a laboratory controlled cooling simulator, an extended version the forced-air based cooling conveyor [15,16]. On the basis of thermocouple measurements cooling curves were plotted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In forging tests, conducted on a hydraulic press of capacity 5 MN at working speed 20 mm/s, which for flat billet resulted in strain rate corresponding to its average level observed during soft blows of hammer forging of the part concerned, forged specimens of square cross-section 30×30 mm were deformed with true strain 0,48. After hot deformation the specimens were subject to controlled cooling with accelerated air with and without mist, varying increased cooling rate, realized in a laboratory controlled cooling simulator, an extended version the forced-air based cooling conveyor [15,16]. On the basis of thermocouple measurements cooling curves were plotted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal analysis was based on the determined functions of heat transfer coefficient for given settings of the cooling line (presented in Section 3.2 ). For natural air cooling (transfer and the end of the process) constant value 30 W/m 2 ·K, water temperature 25 °C and temperature-dependent emissivity function based on [ 44 ] were assumed. As in the experiment where a one-sided or symmetrical air inlet could be alternatively used, both symmetrical and asymmetrical cooling conditions were taken into consideration.…”
Section: Models and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having validated the temperature calculations, using pyrometer measurement with on-line correction of emissivity (Skubisz et al, 2011), temperature, effective strain and effective strain rate, were taken from the simulation to carry out mathematical modeling of microstructure development for all of the investigated forging chains. These are: I) impressiondie forging with preforming in cogging operation followed by blocker and finisher impression forging, realized altogether in 11-14 hammer blows, see figure 3 (Skubisz et al, 2015); II) assumption of bend axis, which resulted in preforming in bending operation (figure 4), and III) multiple forging impression forging with use of cogging to reduce flash (figure 5).…”
Section: Geometry and Materials Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%