2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11038-020-09535-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Extraction of Crater Rims on 3D Meshes Combining Artificial Neural Network and Discrete Curvature Labeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researchers [39,40] proposed different parameters to evaluate the performance of the CDA. These methods work by counting craters detected in different states, i.e., true positives (TPs) corresponding to real detected craters and false positives (FPs) corresponding to detected craters that do not exist.…”
Section: Simulation Verification On Sandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers [39,40] proposed different parameters to evaluate the performance of the CDA. These methods work by counting craters detected in different states, i.e., true positives (TPs) corresponding to real detected craters and false positives (FPs) corresponding to detected craters that do not exist.…”
Section: Simulation Verification On Sandmentioning
confidence: 99%