2016
DOI: 10.1117/12.2234795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated extraction of urban trees from mobile LiDAR point clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To verify the advantages of our method, we compared our extraction accuracy with that of other existing methods, including Wu2013 [13], Wu2016 [14], Li2016 [15], Teo2016 [11], Zhong2017 [12], Xu2018 [6], Ning2022 [9], and Li2022 [17]. Since the individual extraction results of street trees are highly related to the complexity of the scene where they are located, for objective comparison, we map the scene type of each study to the four common scenes defined in this article according to the street tree scene complexity presented in it.…”
Section: B Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To verify the advantages of our method, we compared our extraction accuracy with that of other existing methods, including Wu2013 [13], Wu2016 [14], Li2016 [15], Teo2016 [11], Zhong2017 [12], Xu2018 [6], Ning2022 [9], and Li2022 [17]. Since the individual extraction results of street trees are highly related to the complexity of the scene where they are located, for objective comparison, we map the scene type of each study to the four common scenes defined in this article according to the street tree scene complexity presented in it.…”
Section: B Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, both of them are not competent for common Scene 4 where there is dense vegetation under the trees and the tree sizes vary greatly. Among other methods for comparison, Wu2013 [13], Wu 2016 [14], and Li2016 [15] all use the trunk detection-based method to segment and extract individual trees, while Li2022 [17] identifies and locates each tree based on the junction of trunk and branches, and Xu2018 [6] and Ning2022 [9] both use treetops as the basis for the individual segmentation of each tree after classification. Here, to compare the extraction results on complex common Scene 4, we select Wu2013 [13], Li2022 [17], and Xu2018 [6] as representative methods for street tree extraction based on trunk, trunk-branches junction, and treetop detection to individually segment and extract street trees in complex Road 6.…”
Section: B Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Zhong et al (2013), the growing uses seeds that were selected by the local maxima in the horizontal histogram of the voxelised point cloud by octree decomposition. Using the improved supervoxel structure, in Wu et al (2016), a breadth-first search-based growing is employed, in which the seeds are selected by the gravity center of the supervoxel, which contains concentrated points. However, due to the scanning pattern of MLS, the identification of optimised seeds for growth is always a challenging task since either tree trunks or crowns suffer from occlusions, with merely partially scanned points acquired.…”
Section: Segmentation Of Individual Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%