2020
DOI: 10.1109/tci.2020.2971136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated FDK-Filter Selection for Cone-Beam CT in Research Environments

Abstract: Users of X-ray (micro-)CT in research environments often study many different types of objects, with many different research questions. For each new scan, the settings of the scan (number of angles, dose, cone angle) are chosen by the user, often based on how much time is available, the dose sensitivity of the sample, and geometrical characteristics of the particular CT-scanner that is used. The FDK algorithm is the most common reconstruction method used for circular cone-beam data. Its filter is typically cho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [ 22 , 23 , 33 ], exponential binning is used to approximate filters, leading to coefficients to describe a filter. This approximation can be seen as a matrix applied to a coefficient vector : …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [ 22 , 23 , 33 ], exponential binning is used to approximate filters, leading to coefficients to describe a filter. This approximation can be seen as a matrix applied to a coefficient vector : …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While iterative methods have been shown to be more accurate for noisy and limited data problems [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], they have a significantly higher computational cost. Consequently, there have been efforts to improve the accuracy of direct methods by computing data-specific or scanner-specific filters [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Although these strategies do improve the reconstruction accuracy, they also add significant computational effort or are specific to one modality, e.g., tomosynthesis [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our implementation-adapted filters are thus minimumresidual filters that have been optimized to each implementation I. The main difference between the previous works (Pelt & Batenburg, 2014;Lagerwerf et al, 2020a) and our present study is that we use a fixed forward operator in our optimization problem, which is not necessarily the transpose of the backprojection operator. More importantly, our goal in this paper is not the improvement of reconstruction accuracy, but the reduction of differences in reconstruction between various software implementations.…”
Section: Research Papers 3 Implementation-adapted Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pÞ: Out of all reconstructions that an implemented algorithm can produce for a given dataset p by varying the filter, this reconstruction, r à I , is the one that results in the smallest residual error. Such filters are known as minimum-residual filters and have previously been proposed to improve reconstructions of real-space analytical algorithms in low-dose settings (Pelt & Batenburg, 2014;Lagerwerf et al, 2020a).…”
Section: Research Papers 3 Implementation-adapted Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the filter width is proportional to the number of pixels in each detector row, we have N e = O(log N f ) = O(log N ). This technique yields suitable filter approximations, as observed in [15,12]. Second, training may be accelerated by sampling a subset of voxels on which to minimize Equation (7), rather than the full volume.…”
Section: Algorithm 1 Nn-fbp Reconstruction Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%