2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68288-4_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Fine-Grained Trust Assessment in Federated Knowledge Bases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we order the links of each node by descending weight on line 4 of Algorithm 1. Then, we initialize the head links of the node by accumulating all the links having the two heaviest weights (lines [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. During the head link weight accumulation, the rankedWeight function (line 9) adopts an increasing ratio rw i ∈ (0, 1] starting from the second heaviest link (i = 1):…”
Section: A Weight-preserving Reduction Of the Similarity Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…First, we order the links of each node by descending weight on line 4 of Algorithm 1. Then, we initialize the head links of the node by accumulating all the links having the two heaviest weights (lines [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. During the head link weight accumulation, the rankedWeight function (line 9) adopts an increasing ratio rw i ∈ (0, 1] starting from the second heaviest link (i = 1):…”
Section: A Weight-preserving Reduction Of the Similarity Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This category is extended with mixen, representing the union of the samples of the category datasets belonging to the English DBpedia. The second category are biomedical datasets 5 while the third category are open government datasets 6 . Some statistics about each dataset are listed in Table I.…”
Section: B Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations