1987
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/224.3.557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated galaxy surface photometry - I. Technique, calibration and validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The output from the APM is an optical density. Cawson et al (1987) showed that the optical density calculated by the APM is, to a good approximation, linearly related to the incident intensity on the photographic plate for the typical range of optical density encountered for this type of extraction. Once scanned, the digitized plates were reduced and the spectra extracted off-line.…”
Section: Observational Datamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The output from the APM is an optical density. Cawson et al (1987) showed that the optical density calculated by the APM is, to a good approximation, linearly related to the incident intensity on the photographic plate for the typical range of optical density encountered for this type of extraction. Once scanned, the digitized plates were reduced and the spectra extracted off-line.…”
Section: Observational Datamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Thus 5780 deg 2 of H i data, in the velocity range between −1280 and +12 700 km s −1 , were searched largely by eye to come up with 1107 sources (Garcia‐Appadoo 2005). The Equatorial Strip was chosen because (i) it was approximately perpendicular to the Galactic plane and so it is mostly dark enough to make LSBGs detectable; (ii) it is accessible for follow up with a large range of instruments including the Very Large Array (VLA), and for some of its area the SDSS‐DR2; (iii) it includes the area searched for LSBGs by Impey et al (1996) using the Automated Plate Measurement (APM) machine (Cawson et al 1987) to scan United Kingdom Schmidt plates. This should eventually lead to an estimate of the number of LSBGs still missing from wide‐scale optical surveys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The APM parameters are calculated using emulsion density D , rather than incident flux f measurements. Below the emulsion saturation D max , it is fairly well approximated by a linear relationship, where α and β are constants for any particular part of the plate (Cawson et al 1987; Maddox et al 1990a,b), and the value of D max is found to vary by 2 per cent across the field (Maddox et al 1990b). The incident flux f is the sum of the sky flux f sky and the object flux f obj .…”
Section: Measurement Of Surface Brightnessmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They are directly related to true SB only if there is a linear relationship between the real flux and the APM density (). Clearly the emulsion saturation violates this assumption, and CCD observations show that it is not exactly linear below saturation (Cawson et al 1987). Our fitting technique approximates the saturation as a simple maximum APM density, and ignores any non‐linearity below the saturation density.…”
Section: Measurement Of Surface Brightnessmentioning
confidence: 99%