Automated High-Ohmic Resistance Bridge With Voltage and Current Null Detection

Rietveld, G.; Beek, J.H.N. van der

doi:10.1109/tim.2013.2250171

Cited by 13 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The error current flowing through the current detector was converted to voltage using a transimpedance amplifier (Femto DDPCA-300) [16,17] and the output voltage was measured using a 7.5 digit digital multimeter (Keithley DMM7510) in the entire resistance range of 10 MΩ to 100 TΩ instead of using a voltmeter as a detector [18]. The low terminal of the DMM7510 and the chassis of all equipment were connected to a common ground.…”

Section: Nmij Traveling Dsbmentioning

confidence: 99%

Precise high resistance comparison between the NMIJ traveling dual source bridge and the NIST adapted Wheatstone bridge

Oe¹,

Payagala²,

Panna³

et al. 2022

Metrologia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A precise high resistance comparison was performed between the traveling dual-source bridge developed by the national metrology institute of Japan (NMIJ) and the adapted Wheatstone bridge of the national institute of standards and technology (NIST) from 10 MΩ to 100~TΩ at NIST. The NMIJ traveling bridge was shipped to NIST Gaithersburg and was installed right next to the NIST bridge and these bridges alternately measured the resistance ratio of the high resistance standards, without moving the location of the resistors inside the temperature-controlled air bath. Having the bridges and resistance standards in the same location for the comparison decreased the transportation and temperature coefficient effects on the resistance standards, contributing to the excellent agreement of the measured values. The NMIJ traveling bridge used an 8.5-digit digital multimeter and a relay switch box to determine a resistance ratio by measuring the ratio of the voltages applied to the resistors. The comparison was started from 10 MΩ based on the same 1 MΩ standard resistor calibrated using a NIST 2-terminal cryogenic current comparator bridge, and standard resistors from 10 MΩ to 100 TΩ were calibrated by repeating 10:1 scaling measurements with both systems. Excellent agreement was obtained within the uncertainty of all resistance ranges and the difference between both systems was less than 1 μΩ/Ω up to 1 TΩ and the degrees of equivalence for 10 TΩ and 100 TΩ were less than 6 μΩ/Ω.

show abstract

Section: Nmij Traveling Dsbmentioning

confidence: 99%

Precise high resistance comparison between the NMIJ traveling dual source bridge and the NIST adapted Wheatstone bridge

Oe¹,

Payagala²,

Panna³

et al. 2022

Metrologia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Equation (10) applies for R x /R s1 ≥ 1000. Correlations among V S , V S1 and V S2 in equation 9and (10) were estimated by the ISO GUM guide and were negligible. The measurement uncertainty budgets for the potentiometric variants, namely VSVM, LC-VSVM, and LCPM, are shown in Table V and the uncertainty of TM was estimated by its specification.…”

Section: Uncertainty Estimationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, a need is present to calibrate those ranges using high resistance standards up to 10 PΩ. There are inherent limits to methods involving dual source bridges (DSBs) [7][8][9][10], DC calibrators and digital multimeters (DMMs) [11][12], which are used to measure up to 100 TΩ. And although there has been recently reported work on making 1 PΩ measurements using a DSB [13][14], there is still no method to calibrate higher resistances than 10 PΩ.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Multiple Methods for Obtaining P$\Omega$ Resistances With Low Uncertainties

Jarrett

Rigosi

et al. 2020

IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Capabilities for high resistance determinations are essential for calibration of currents below 1 pA, as typically requested in several applications, including semiconductor device characterization, single electron transport, and ion beam technologies. This need to calibrate low currents warrants the expansion of accessible values of high resistance. We present several methods for measuring resistances on the PΩ scale, namely potentiometry, dual source bridge measurements, and teraohmmeter usage, all of which are subsequently compared to theoretical calculations. These methods were used to measure four 1 PΩ resistances, one 10 PΩ resistance, and one 100 PΩ resistance, all generated by wye-delta networks containing three resistance elements. The differences between the experimentally obtained values and the theoretical values typically agree within 1 % for 1 PΩ, 10 PΩ and 100 PΩ resistances and the measurement uncertainties for the three techniques were estimated to be between 0.4 % to 4.8 % for 1 PΩ, 2.8 % to 5.6 % for 10 PΩ, and 4.4 % to 10.2 % for 100 PΩ.

show abstract

“…Measurements of lowstandard resistors are important for the power industry because of their use in high dc currents calibrations [1]. For high-ohmic standard resistors, it is important to make more accurate measurements because secondary laboratories used them in the calibrations of small dc currents and commercial teraohmmeters [2]. Because of increasing demand for high accuracy for industry and for the scientific metrology, more accurate measurement methods are being developed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applied signal effect in the potentiometric method on the resistance measurements accuracy

Ali¹

2018

Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, the effect of applying dc voltage and dc current sources in using the potentiometric method on the accuracy and the uncertainty of the resistance measurements is studied. This study is done practically for the low and high values of standard resistance ranges from 100 to 10 MΩ. The traceability chain for the used resistors is introduced by using the standard resistors 1 Ω Thomas type, 10 kΩ model SR104, and four Hamon transfer standards. The system operation is remotely controlled by using a LabVIEW program to improve the performance. The measurement results and the uncertainty estimation values are discussed to identify the effect of the applied voltage and current on the different resistance ranges measurement.

show abstract

Automated High-Ohmic Resistance Bridge With Voltage and Current Null Detection

Cited by 13 publications

References 4 publications

Precise high resistance comparison between the NMIJ traveling dual source bridge and the NIST adapted Wheatstone bridge

Precise high resistance comparison between the NMIJ traveling dual source bridge and the NIST adapted Wheatstone bridge

Comparison of Multiple Methods for Obtaining P$\Omega$ Resistances With Low Uncertainties

Applied signal effect in the potentiometric method on the resistance measurements accuracy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About