2019
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/480/1/012026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated hole expansion test with pneumatic crack detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The test is conducted until the chosen crack detection method generates a stopping signal. The principle layout of the testing device and procedure for the HET with pneumatic crack detection is shown in [9].…”
Section: Test Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The test is conducted until the chosen crack detection method generates a stopping signal. The principle layout of the testing device and procedure for the HET with pneumatic crack detection is shown in [9].…”
Section: Test Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test was stopped when the air pressure dropped by 0.0045 bar (within 5 data points). As the drop in air pressure was detected automatically using the control of the testing machine, smaller stopping values were applied compared to [9]. A decrease of the force value between 0.01 and 0.1 kN was used to stop the HET with the force drop method.…”
Section: Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method may be insufficient for some materials and test conditions, as multiple microcracks may appear simultaneously, requiring additional approaches. Leonhardt et al [10] employed an automated pneumatic system to detect the crack. The authors concluded that the developed approach exhibits sufficient sensitivity to accurately determine the HER for different process parameters, e.g., cutting clearance and initial hole diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%