2016
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201600015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated hollow‐fiber liquid‐phase microextraction followed by liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry for the determination of benzodiazepine drugs in biological samples

Abstract: In this study, two-phase hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction and three-phase hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction based on two immiscible organic solvents were compared for extraction of oxazepam and Lorazepam. Separations were performed on a liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry instrument. Under optimal conditions, three-phase hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction based on two immiscible organic solvents has a better extraction efficiency. In a urine sample, for three-phase hollow fiber… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…: ER %= PF ×VnormalaVnormals×100where V a and V s are the volumes of the acceptor phase and sample solution, respectively. Relative recovery (RR%) was calculated from the following equation: RR %=C found C real C added ×100where C found is the concentration of the analyte in the real sample after addition of specific amount of standard solution, C real is the initial concentration of the analyte in the real sample, and C added is the concentration of the analyte spiked into the real sample solution .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: ER %= PF ×VnormalaVnormals×100where V a and V s are the volumes of the acceptor phase and sample solution, respectively. Relative recovery (RR%) was calculated from the following equation: RR %=C found C real C added ×100where C found is the concentration of the analyte in the real sample after addition of specific amount of standard solution, C real is the initial concentration of the analyte in the real sample, and C added is the concentration of the analyte spiked into the real sample solution .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, continued use of BZPs may have adverse effects, such as drowsiness, dizziness, and decreased alertness. Furthermore, BZPs are readily available, which increases their potential for addiction . Besides, BZPs may also find their way into our environment, since they are excreted partially unchanged, and thus have been detected in wastewaters .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of classical BZDs is included in a systematic toxicology analysis (STA), when the first screening method is based on immunochemical tests and assays, and then followed by an instrumental analysis (LC–MS or GC–MS) for the confirmation and quantification of BZDs concentration levels in biological fluids (namely serum and urine) . Due to the structural similarity of the classical BZDs and DBZDs, the immunochemical screening can lead to positive results when DBZDs‐related metabolites (namely glucuronides) are present in the (urine) sample .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%