2017
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-11-16-0417-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Identification of Northern Leaf Blight-Infected Maize Plants from Field Imagery Using Deep Learning

Abstract: Northern leaf blight (NLB) can cause severe yield loss in maize; however, scouting large areas to accurately diagnose the disease is time consuming and difficult. We demonstrate a system capable of automatically identifying NLB lesions in field-acquired images of maize plants with high reliability. This approach uses a computational pipeline of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) that addresses the challenges of limited data and the myriad irregularities that appear in images of field-grown plants. Several CN… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
152
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 329 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
152
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The datasets used for evaluating GPMNet were acquired after the training dataset and included different grape germplasm, although Chardonnay was included in both. This approach ensured that the testing dataset was independent of the training dataset and perhaps provided a more rigorous test than randomly dividing a single image database into training, validation and test images as is commonly done [10][11][12]. Having a CNN that generalizes well to new accessions reduces the need to continually retrain the CNN, and is an important consideration when working with diverse breeding germplasm with a broad set of grape leaf characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The datasets used for evaluating GPMNet were acquired after the training dataset and included different grape germplasm, although Chardonnay was included in both. This approach ensured that the testing dataset was independent of the training dataset and perhaps provided a more rigorous test than randomly dividing a single image database into training, validation and test images as is commonly done [10][11][12]. Having a CNN that generalizes well to new accessions reduces the need to continually retrain the CNN, and is an important consideration when working with diverse breeding germplasm with a broad set of grape leaf characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in deep learning CNNs have brought their performance to levels that rival human observers for correctly classifying labeled images. CNNs have been successfully applied to many biological classification problems including the classification of leaf images for species identification and the detection of different diseases and stresses [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, if the seeds are not severely wet (seed color does not change and seeds do not swell), the relative humidity has no influence on the method of hyperspectral imaging combined deep learning. At present, deep networks have been successfully applied to plant disease identification [36][37][38], drought monitoring [39], land type classification [40], weed detection [41], and other areas of agriculture. To date, there are few reports on the identification of soybean seed varieties by deep learning, and whether it has advantages that is also unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these annotations consisted of a line drawn down the principal axis of a lesion. With these line annotations, we trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to recognize NLB lesions in images taken by hand with 96.7% accuracy (DeChant et al, 2017) and in aerial field images with 95.0% accuracy . Delineating lesion boundaries with polygons would be ideal, as such annotations can ultimately yield much more precise image segmentation than lower-resolution annotations (Bell et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%