TENCON 2018 - 2018 IEEE Region 10 Conference 2018
DOI: 10.1109/tencon.2018.8650088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Image Capturing System for Deep Learning-based Tomato Plant Leaf Disease Detection and Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, the authors reviewed many research articles and identified 129 studies eligible for systematic review using the PRISMA statement as presented in Figure S2 in the Supplementary Materials, these studies involve methodologies in image processing, machine learning, and deep learning particularly focused on the identification and classification of plant diseases. The study showed that the techniques most used in the literature, in general, are the support vector machine [22,59,61,65] (SVM), random forest [87] (RF), artificial neural network [84] (ANN) and convolutional neural network (CNN) [35,39,50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the authors reviewed many research articles and identified 129 studies eligible for systematic review using the PRISMA statement as presented in Figure S2 in the Supplementary Materials, these studies involve methodologies in image processing, machine learning, and deep learning particularly focused on the identification and classification of plant diseases. The study showed that the techniques most used in the literature, in general, are the support vector machine [22,59,61,65] (SVM), random forest [87] (RF), artificial neural network [84] (ANN) and convolutional neural network (CNN) [35,39,50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. Prasad et al [38] used a KNN based model on the tomato data of 14,529 images in 10 classes and achieved an accuracy of 93%. R. G. de Luna et al [39] proposed an automated image capturing system that achieved an accuracy of 91.67% on the tomato dataset. X. Q. Guo et al [40] designed a new model named multiscale AlexNet, which achieved 92.7% accuracy on 5,766 images in 8 classes of the tomato dataset.…”
Section: ) Comparison With State-of-the-art Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These use highly accurate methods for identifying plant disease in tomato leaves. In addition, researchers have proposed many deep learning-based solutions in disease detection and classification, as discussed below in [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The testing results show that the INAR-SSD model achieves a detection rate of 23.13 frames per second and detection performance of 78.80% mAP on the Apple Leaf Disease Dataset (ALDD). Furthermore, the results indicate that the innovative INAR-SSD (SSD with Inception module and Rainbow concatenation) model produces more accurate and faster results for the early identification of tomato leaf diseases than other methods [ 46 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%