2020 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/sii46433.2020.9026298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Image Presentation for Backhoe Embankment Construction in Unmanned Construction Site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nicolis [99] used an assistant camera arm that keeps a primary gripper arm and manipulated object in view while avoiding occlusions in a scenario motivated by nuclear decommissioning. Chikushi [100] used an assistant UGV to provide an external view for a primary teleoperated UGV (backhoe construction machine) in a scenario motivated by disaster response. The assistant UGV autonomously moved to track and keep fiducials on the primary UGV in the predefined position in the image.…”
Section: Reactive Autonomous Visual Assistantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nicolis [99] used an assistant camera arm that keeps a primary gripper arm and manipulated object in view while avoiding occlusions in a scenario motivated by nuclear decommissioning. Chikushi [100] used an assistant UGV to provide an external view for a primary teleoperated UGV (backhoe construction machine) in a scenario motivated by disaster response. The assistant UGV autonomously moved to track and keep fiducials on the primary UGV in the predefined position in the image.…”
Section: Reactive Autonomous Visual Assistantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The error rate was defined as either the number of collisions [101,103,102,94,105,106,92,93,42,95] or was task-specific (error distance in object placing [79], the classification accuracy of task outcome prediction [107], number of object drops during manipulation [95], or mistakes in REACH-ABILITY judgment [38,39,40,41]). The third was psychological metrics used by 14 out of 32 studies [82,98,104,81,92,93,38,39,40,41,42,89,95,100]. Those were measured by a post-completion questionnaire and assessed perceived mental workload, frustration, confidence, perceived task difficulty, perceived view helpfulness, perceived effectiveness, perceived level of task accomplishment, or perceived level of accuracy.…”
Section: Deliberative Autonomous Visual Assistantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second category was manual visual assistants (10 studies) where the visual assistant was teleoperated [1], [15], [23]- [26], [56]- [59]. The third category was reactive autonomous visual assistants (15 studies) where the visual assistant was autonomous but only reactively tracked the primary robot or object of interest without reasoning if there might be a better viewpoint [38], [60]- [73]. The fourth category was deliberative autonomous visual assistants (15 studies) where the visual assistant was autonomous and deliberatively reasoned about what would be the best viewpoints [17], [33], [35]- [37], [40]- [42], [74]- [79].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Construction work in Japan, which is often affected by natural disasters such as large-scale earthquakes, windstorms, floods, and volcanic disasters, has been attracting attention for initiating the remote operation of construction machines from a safe location in cases where the actual location faces a risk of secondary disasters such as mudslides [ 1 , 2 ]. Compared to actual machine operation, remote operation requires care and consideration because it is difficult to ascertain the situation of the construction machine and the working environment; this tends to place a higher psychological load on the operator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%