2021
DOI: 10.1364/boe.418079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated image processing pipeline for adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy

Abstract: To mitigate the substantial post-processing burden associated with adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO), we have developed an open-source, automated AOSLO image processing pipeline with both “live” and “full” modes. The live mode provides feedback during acquisition, while the full mode is intended to automatically integrate the copious disparate modules currently used in generating analyzable montages. The mean (±SD) lag between initiation and montage placement for the live pipeline was 54.6 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Automatic retinal image montaging has been demonstrated in prior art, but most implementations have focused on obtaining image strips that extend into the periphery along two cardinal axes rather than constructing continuous retinal montages that encompass the entire 5-degree fovea [49,54,55]. For quantifying cone density across the entire fovea, it is advantageous to obtain a continuous map of the photoreceptor mosaic with a diameter larger than 5 degrees centered on the foveola, which is why we implemented the full-field imaging strategy described in Section 5.1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic retinal image montaging has been demonstrated in prior art, but most implementations have focused on obtaining image strips that extend into the periphery along two cardinal axes rather than constructing continuous retinal montages that encompass the entire 5-degree fovea [49,54,55]. For quantifying cone density across the entire fovea, it is advantageous to obtain a continuous map of the photoreceptor mosaic with a diameter larger than 5 degrees centered on the foveola, which is why we implemented the full-field imaging strategy described in Section 5.1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference frames with minimal distortion due to eye movement were selected from each image sequence either manually or automatically (4), for registration and averaging of at least 40 images at each retinal location to increase the signal-to-noise ratio (5). Intraframe motion correction (de-warping) was then applied to remove any residual distortion (6).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these metrics are necessarily robust to noise and are designed for image alignment to a reference image, not as descriptors of image quality. While there exist algorithms capable of rejecting poor reference images before alignment based on metrics such as mean intensity, contrast, and sharpness [ 16 , 17 ], the quality of the final registered image is not always related to the quality of the reference image, and ultimately a user is still required to select suitable quality images from a subset of registered and averaged candidate images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, no-reference image quality metrics are often more desirable for evaluating AOSLO images. This includes metrics like mean intensity [ 8 , 5 ], contrast [ 6 ], sharpness [ 16 , 17 ], Fourier coefficient energy [ 6 , 7 ], Blind Image Quality Index (BIQI) [ 3 , 20 , 21 ], and Perception-based Image Quality Evaluator (PIQE) [ 21 ]. Many of these have found extensive use in sensorless AO, where they are used as metrics to drive optimization of an AO control loop but are not commonly reported in literature as a descriptive measure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%