2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated inference of likely metamorphic relations for model transformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These properties are possibly the most successful examples of patterns so far having been used by different research groups for the identification and inference of metamorphic relations in several machine learning and numerical programs, e.g., [15], [16], [22]- [24]. Troya et al [14] identified a set of domain-independent trace patterns to automatically infer likely metamorphic relations in the context of model transformations.…”
Section: Background a Metamorphic Relation Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These properties are possibly the most successful examples of patterns so far having been used by different research groups for the identification and inference of metamorphic relations in several machine learning and numerical programs, e.g., [15], [16], [22]- [24]. Troya et al [14] identified a set of domain-independent trace patterns to automatically infer likely metamorphic relations in the context of model transformations.…”
Section: Background a Metamorphic Relation Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because patterns guide testers on the search for metamorphic relations with a certain structure, making the identification of the relations significantly easier than when starting from scratch. Second, the identification of patterns is a key point to enable the automated inference of likely metamorphic relations that conform to those patterns [14]. For example, papers on the automated inference of likely metamorphic relations in numerical and machine learning programs (e.g., [15], [16]) typically search for instances of the "metamorphic properties" (similar to the concept of pattern) defined by Murphy et al back in 2008 [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inference process is constrained by searching for a set of predefined metamorphic relations. Javier [17] proposed an approach to infer likely metamorphic relations automatically for Atlas Transformation Language (ATL) model transformations. Liu [14] proposed a method named composition of metamorphic relations (CMR) to construct new metamorphic relations by combining several existing relations.…”
Section: Metamorphic Relation Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies try to classify the classification of MRs based on machine learning methods [12,13], or attempt to construct more MRs based on information of the existence of the initial MRs [14,15]. Other recent research has yield MR identification based on the concepts of category and choice [16,17]. Liu [14] verified that the composition of metamorphic relations can improve the failure-detection capabilities rather than any particular metamorphic relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A concrete example of an "equivalence" MROP is that a search for YouTube videos should return the same set of videos "regardless of the ordering criteria specified (date, rating, relevance, title, or number of views)" [39]. Segura et al [39] hypothesized that their proposed patterns could also be useful for automated inferencing of likely MRs for a given API; however, they also pointed out that such research, as in [40]- [42], was challenging, and still at an early stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%