2009
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated inference of molecular mechanisms of disease from amino acid substitutions

Abstract: predrag@indiana.edu; smooney@buckinstitute.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
659
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 730 publications
(669 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
6
659
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although 3 nm short-wavelength shifted as compared with WT, the spectral peak of absorbance for the R69H variant pigment lies within an acceptable experimental range (<5 nm). In contrast to our human data, bovine R69H rhodopsin was table 2 Bioinformatic analyses using three commonly used mutation programs of pathogenicity, SIFT, 37 PolyPhen2, 38 and MutPred, 39 shown previously to produce an abnormally translated protein in a baculovirus expression system. 34 However, we have been unable to confirm a role of R69H in the pathogenicity of retinal disease in Patient 4.…”
Section: Validation Of Functional Analysescontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Although 3 nm short-wavelength shifted as compared with WT, the spectral peak of absorbance for the R69H variant pigment lies within an acceptable experimental range (<5 nm). In contrast to our human data, bovine R69H rhodopsin was table 2 Bioinformatic analyses using three commonly used mutation programs of pathogenicity, SIFT, 37 PolyPhen2, 38 and MutPred, 39 shown previously to produce an abnormally translated protein in a baculovirus expression system. 34 However, we have been unable to confirm a role of R69H in the pathogenicity of retinal disease in Patient 4.…”
Section: Validation Of Functional Analysescontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Variant tolerance prediction methods included Mutation Taster [Schwarz et al, 2010], MutPred [Li et al, 2009], nsSNPAnalyzer [Bao et al, 2005], PhD-SNP [Capriotti et al, 2006], PMut [Ferrer-Costa et al, 2005], PolyPhen2 [Adzhubei et al, 2010], SIFT [Ng and Henikoff, 2003], SNAP [Bromberg and Rost, 2007], and SNPs&GO [Calabrese et al, 2009]. Sequence-based stability effect predictions were performed with SCPRED [Dosztányi et al, 1997], MUPRO [Cheng et al, 2006], and I-Mutant 3.0 [Capriotti et al, 2005], and structurebased predictions with SCide (stabilization centers) [Dosztanyi et al, 2003] and SRide (stabilizing residues) [Magyar et al, 2005] for MSH2 and MSH6 variants.…”
Section: Prediction Of Pathogenicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After identification of variants, allele frequencies were assessed in controls using restriction endonuclease digestion (Ava II) or using HybProbe chemistry and a LightCycler (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The significance of the identified variant p.R47W was assessed by considering the conservation of the affected amino acid, the nature and location of the change, its rarity assessed in own controls and population-based datasets, and the possible impact of the amino acid substitution by five different mutation prediction tools (Mutation Taster [9], MutPred [10], SIFT [11], Polyphen2 [12], and SNAP [13]). We analyzed p.R47W by checking two large population-based databases, dbSNP (release 138 at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp) and the Exome Sequencing Project (ESP6500SI-V2 dataset) of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/ [14]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%