2020
DOI: 10.1029/2018rs006779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Ionospheric Scattering Layer Hypothesis Generation for Detected and Classified Auroral Global Positioning System Scintillation Events

Abstract: We describe a method to detect and classify global positioning system (GPS) scintillation, and then hypothesize a possible ionospheric layer scattering the signal. The objective is to routinely identify events of interest to investigate in detail in future work. Scintillation types include amplitude, phase, or both amplitude and phase. A scintillation event is one for which a scintillation index remains above a threshold across a majority of closely spaced receivers viewing a single satellite. Events are categ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A scintillation receiver or array is required for detection and classification of scintillation types and time intervals. A collocated measure of electron density is needed for hypothesizing the layer in the manner described by Sreenivash et al (2020). As in that work, we use the Scintillation Auroral GPS Array (SAGA) for measuring scintillation and the Poker Flat Incoherent Scatter Radar (PFISR) for electron density measurements.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A scintillation receiver or array is required for detection and classification of scintillation types and time intervals. A collocated measure of electron density is needed for hypothesizing the layer in the manner described by Sreenivash et al (2020). As in that work, we use the Scintillation Auroral GPS Array (SAGA) for measuring scintillation and the Poker Flat Incoherent Scatter Radar (PFISR) for electron density measurements.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the auroral zone, scintillations have been observed to be associated with auroral arcs, which may arise in the E layer or the F layer (Mrak et al, 2018). Recently a method of hypothesizing an irregularity layer based on incoherent scatter radar measurements of peak density was introduced to survey high-latitude phase scintillations observed from a closely spaced array of scintillation receivers during the years 2014-2015 (Sreenivash et al, 2020). For those solar maximum years, for the incoherent scatter radar processed and available at that time, E layer and F layer phase scintillations were both common.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAGA consists of up to seven connected autonomous space environment sensors (CASES) scintillation receivers sited at baseline distances ranging from about 200 m to 3 km apart [12]. An arraywide interval of scintillation received from GPS satellite PRN 23 at L1 was detected from about 03:43-04:17 UT using scintillation indices [13], [27]. These 100-Hz measurements are then processed for the time periods identified by techniques detailed in [28] to obtain detrended and filtered high-rate amplitude/phase observations.…”
Section: Estimation Of Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limit on thickness enforces that the scattering layer does not extend all the way to the ground but must end at the bottom of the ionosphere in order to remain physically realistic. We select the best fit spectrum as the one that minimizes the mean-squared error in (27) between the observed and measured ratios. Considering that the Rytov approximation tends to be smoother than the actual signal spectra [15], the meansquared errors 2 are computed for the portion of the spectral ratios between κ v corresponding to the minimum value of the ratio and κ v three times larger than the lowest wavenumber at which the ratio exceeds 1.…”
Section: Estimation Of Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation