Automated Knee Osteoarthritis Assessment Increases Physicians’ Agreement Rate and Accuracy: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Abstract

Objective. To assess the impact of a computerized system on physicians’ accuracy and agreement rate, as compared with unaided diagnosis. Methods. A set of 124 unilateral knee radiographs from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) study were analyzed by a computerized method with regard to Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade, as well as joint space narrowing, osteophytes, and sclerosis Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) grades. Physicians scored all images, with regard to osteophytes, sclerosis, joint space narrowing OARSI grades and KL grade, in 2 modalities: through a plain radiograph ( unaided) and a radiograph presented together with the report from the computer assisted detection system ( aided). Intraclass correlation between the physicians was calculated for both modalities. Furthermore, physicians’ performance was compared with the grading of the OAI study, and accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated in both modalities for each of the scored features. Results. Agreement rates for KL grade, sclerosis, and osteophyte OARSI grades, were statistically increased in the aided versus the unaided modality. Readings for joint space narrowing OARSI grade did not show a statistically difference between the 2 modalities. Readers’ accuracy and specificity for KL grade >0, KL >1, sclerosis OARSI grade >0, and osteophyte OARSI grade >0 was significantly increased in the aided modality. Reader sensitivity was high in both modalities. Conclusions. These results show that the use of an automated knee OA software increases consistency between physicians when grading radiographic features of OA. The use of the software also increased accuracy measures as compared with the OAI study, mostly through increases in specificity.

Saudi Radiology Personnel’s Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Implementation: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…6 Several additional studies have shown that automated quantification of nodules, bone age prediction, and knee assessment (eg, osteoarthritis) can help reduce radiologists' workload and improve diagnosis accuracy. [7][8][9] Additionally, AI-based applications may improve image interpretation in differentiating lung viruses such as COVID-19 from other pneumonia diseases. 10,11 It remains to be seen whether AI will aid radiographers in clinical decision-making, such as scanning protocols or radiation doses.…”

How does artificial intelligence in radiology improve efficiency and health outcomes?

“…For example, it has been shown that bone or vessel suppression on thorax imaging can elevate the detection of lung nodules (level 3) [20,37]. In the area of musculoskeletal radiology, we found that automated knee assessment might improve both the agreement between physicians and the accuracy of the osteoarthritis diagnosis (level 3) [38].…”

Synovial Fluid Biomarkers in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Evaluation Using BIPEDs Criteria

“…Although promising, the analysis of such heterogeneous aspects could seem challenging with the current technologies, but the emerging advances in machine learning protocols may open a completely new horizon for a multidimensional evaluation of OA patients. 185…”