14th International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWBI 2018) 2018
DOI: 10.1117/12.2318326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated lesion detection and segmentation in digital mammography using a u-net deep learning network

Abstract: Computer-aided detection or decision support systems aim to improve breast cancer screening programs by helping radiologists to evaluate digital mammography (DM) exams. Commonly such methods proceed in two steps: selection of candidate regions for malignancy, and later classification as either malignant or not. In this study, we present a candidate detection method based on deep learning to automatically detect and additionally segment soft tissue lesions in DM. A database of DM exams (mostly bilateral and two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also performed free‐response ROC (FROC) analysis to evaluate the localization performance at the level of individual abnormalities (as opposed to DR analysis above, which is an image‐level measure of detection success). The FROC methods were based on connected components analysis 67,68 and intensity peaks of the abnormality maps 69 . An abnormality‐level detection TPR was computed for successful detection of individual abnormalities (as opposed to whole image as in DR analysis or pixel‐level TPR as in the ROC analysis) across all images and measured against the average number of false positive detections per image, at each intensity threshold of our abnormality map.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also performed free‐response ROC (FROC) analysis to evaluate the localization performance at the level of individual abnormalities (as opposed to DR analysis above, which is an image‐level measure of detection success). The FROC methods were based on connected components analysis 67,68 and intensity peaks of the abnormality maps 69 . An abnormality‐level detection TPR was computed for successful detection of individual abnormalities (as opposed to whole image as in DR analysis or pixel‐level TPR as in the ROC analysis) across all images and measured against the average number of false positive detections per image, at each intensity threshold of our abnormality map.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developed network architecture consists of CNN with fully connected network at the last layers. U-net architecture is used in the work presented in [12]. Results indicate a usefulness of U-net in mammogram diagnosis, however, several false positive results are reported.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convolutional neural networks in particular leads to a remarkable impact in image analysis and understanding especially in image segmentation, classification and analysis [4]. Several models employ deep learning are already developed for diagnosis and identification of breast cancer through analysis of digital mammography [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned previously, second category of breast cancer detection methods bypasses feature extraction from candidate regions of interests. One representative method of this category uses a modified deep network architecture known as u-net [37] for segmentation of masses in digital mammograms [38]. Output of the network is a probability map binarized by thresholding.…”
Section: Breast Cancer Abnormal Mass Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%