2015 12th Conference on Computer and Robot Vision 2015
DOI: 10.1109/crv.2015.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Localization of Brain Tumors in MRI Using Potential-K-Means Clustering Algorithm

Abstract: The manual localization and precise segmentation of brain tumors from magnetic resonance images (MRI) is time-consuming and error-prone. In T2 and FLAIR MRI, tumors appear as bright areas of higher signal intensity than their surroundings. In this paper we view the intensity of a pixel as equal to its "workload" and employ an unsupervised learning algorithm called potential-K-means that generates a balanced distribution of the pixels into clusters of approximately equal total intensity. The algorithm is based … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preliminary results also demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our 5-step approach to brain tumor detection and detection and extend this framework to detect other types of tumors in other types of medical images and motivate them to be localized [11]. Cabria et al (2015) proposed "Automated Localization of Brain Tumors in MRI Using Potential-K-means Clustering Algorithm". In this paper, they viewed the intensity of a pixel as equal to its "workload" and employed an unsupervised learning algorithm called potential-K-means that generates a balanced distribution of the pixels into clusters of approximately equal total intensity.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The preliminary results also demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our 5-step approach to brain tumor detection and detection and extend this framework to detect other types of tumors in other types of medical images and motivate them to be localized [11]. Cabria et al (2015) proposed "Automated Localization of Brain Tumors in MRI Using Potential-K-means Clustering Algorithm". In this paper, they viewed the intensity of a pixel as equal to its "workload" and employed an unsupervised learning algorithm called potential-K-means that generates a balanced distribution of the pixels into clusters of approximately equal total intensity.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this paper, they viewed the intensity of a pixel as equal to its "workload" and employed an unsupervised learning algorithm called potential-K-means that generates a balanced distribution of the pixels into clusters of approximately equal total intensity. A set of 22 images of the FLAIR MRI (axial plane) modality from the BRATS dataset was used [12]. S. Priyanka, Dr. AS Naven kumar proposed the name of the noise elimination document "Noise Removal in Remote Sensing Image Using Kalman Filter Algorithm " in 2016.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods [18,27,29] of tumor segmentation use the ground truth in their algorithms to obtain a high-performance result and during evaluation. On the other hand, the methods [30][31][32] are shallow unsupervised methods for tumor segmentation without using the ground truth; our method belongs to these unsupervised ones based on the features extracted from the CNN and the post-processing to reach our objective of tumor segmentation. From Table 6, we can say that our method is better than the unsupervised methods that exist and is of the same performance as supervised methods based on deep learning.…”
Section: Tumor Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brain tumor segmentation, two clusters are isolated in the image by labeling the pixels as either healthy or cancerous by calculating some features [7]. The conventional features for classification are the pixel intensity, depth, color and texture [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%