2003
DOI: 10.1378/chest.124.4_meetingabstracts.190s-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Lung Sound Analysis in Patients With Pneumoni

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
72
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we do not as of yet claim a direct clinical application for our results, this does not preclude consideration of the basic mechanistic concepts for eventual clinical use, possibly even a solution which combines multiparametric lung sound analysis with other noninvasive bedside technologies for the assessment of lung function (e.g., electrical impedance tomography). Concurrent pathophysiologic processes could generate competing lung sounds or alter sound transmission in ways that obscure the distinct sound signatures of inspiratory recruitment, e.g., bronchospasm, fibrotic lung changes, and pneumonia [29][30][31][32][33]. Moreover, the present work cannot define to what extent changes in tidal volume bias the detection of the presented dCE parameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Although we do not as of yet claim a direct clinical application for our results, this does not preclude consideration of the basic mechanistic concepts for eventual clinical use, possibly even a solution which combines multiparametric lung sound analysis with other noninvasive bedside technologies for the assessment of lung function (e.g., electrical impedance tomography). Concurrent pathophysiologic processes could generate competing lung sounds or alter sound transmission in ways that obscure the distinct sound signatures of inspiratory recruitment, e.g., bronchospasm, fibrotic lung changes, and pneumonia [29][30][31][32][33]. Moreover, the present work cannot define to what extent changes in tidal volume bias the detection of the presented dCE parameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The association between crackle classification (fine vs coarse) and the location in the airways of their generation has been previously investigated by Fredberg and Holford, 29 and has been put on a firmer basis by Majumdar et al 30 Although CALSA has not previously been used as an outcome measure for therapeutic interventions, it has been reported that it can detect changes during the course of pharmacologically induced airway obstruction, 31 during forced expiratory maneuvers, 32 and during pathological processes such as pneumonia. 6,33 Baughman and Loudon 5 recorded lung sounds in asthma patients overnight and were able to detect degrees of obstruction severity not revealed by any other measure. CALSA may therefore provide a more sensitive measure to detect alterations in airway geometry than conventional outcome measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjects underwent automated auscultation with a 16-channel lung-sound analyzer (STG1602, Stethographics, Boston, Massachusetts,) described previously, [7][8][9][10] which uses 14 electret condenser microphones embedded in a soft foam pad that is positioned at a 45°angle on a stretcher or a plastic reclining chair. The subject lies recumbent on the microphone pad and each breathing maneuver is recorded for 20 seconds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%