2022
DOI: 10.1111/cns.14002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated machine learning‐based model for the prediction of delirium in patients after surgery for degenerative spinal disease

Abstract: Objective This study used machine learning algorithms to identify critical variables and predict postoperative delirium (POD) in patients with degenerative spinal disease. Methods We included 663 patients who underwent surgery for degenerative spinal disease and received general anesthesia. The LASSO method was used to screen essential features associated with POD. Clinical characteristics, preoperative laboratory parameters, and intraoperative variables were reviewed and were used to construct nine machine le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) effectively captures nonlinear relationships and interactions between predictors and outcomes [39]. Based on these characteristics, previous studies have reported that XGBoost exhibits a high level of accuracy in predicting postoperative delirium [11][12][13][14][15]. Therefore, we used XGBoost, which is a decision tree ensemble learning method, as a complex machine learning model.…”
Section: Development Of Predictive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) effectively captures nonlinear relationships and interactions between predictors and outcomes [39]. Based on these characteristics, previous studies have reported that XGBoost exhibits a high level of accuracy in predicting postoperative delirium [11][12][13][14][15]. Therefore, we used XGBoost, which is a decision tree ensemble learning method, as a complex machine learning model.…”
Section: Development Of Predictive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, machine learning models have garnered attention in the medical field for their high performance in predicting adverse events . Thus, machine learning techniques have been recognized as promising tools for the prediction of postoperative delirium [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] There is a need to identify an optimal screening strategy for delirium beyond cognitive assessment because, until we have it, delirium will likely remain an elusive diagnosis. In recent years, numerous studies have developed models in the hospital setting for estimating the risk of delirium in postoperative patients [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and ICU patients, [23][24][25][26][27][28] but limited work has focused on the ED patient population. 3,29,30 Our objective was to leverage electronic health records to identify a clinically valuable risk estimation model for positive delirium screens in patients admitted from the ED to inpatient units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a need to identify an optimal screening strategy for delirium beyond cognitive assessment because, until we have it, delirium will likely remain an elusive diagnosis. In recent years, numerous studies have developed models in the hospital setting for estimating the risk of delirium in postoperative patients 13–22 and ICU patients, 23–28 but limited work has focused on the ED patient population 3,29,30 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, machine learning models are widely used in medical fields, such as data mining, medical diagnosis, and disease risk prediction, 16 which have good predictive performance 17 . Risk factors for delirium have been used to develop predictive models for delirium in different populations, but no predictive models for delirium in patients with extensive burns have been developed 18,19 . It is difficult to achieve cross‐population usage between existing predictive models 18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%