Automated Merging of Time Series and Textual Operations Data to Extract Technical Limiter Re-Design Recommendations

Abstract

During the construction planning phase of any new well, drilling engineers often look at offset well data to identify information that could be used to drill the new well more efficiently. This is generally a time consuming process. The objective was to develop a recommender system that would automate the process of identifying potential hazards and current technical limiters. The developed methodology consisted of three parts. First, a system is developed that is able to parse textual information found in daily reports to identify key events that occurred in offset wells. Second, time series data from these same offset wells is processed to identify events directly from the patterns in the data, and a reconciliation is done between the time-series data and the contextual data wherever there is a conflict between the two data sets. Finally, KPIs are computed that enable the comparison of various drilling choices and their consequences across the set of offset wells and recommendation are automatically generated for improvements in the construction of a new well. The system was developed on a set of 7 recently drilled wells chosen from a specific North American land operation. The recommendations were compared to recommendation made through manual processing of the data for validation of the approach. The recommender identified ILT and potential NPT scenarios, optimal depth-based drilling parameter for the new well, and recommendations on BHA and flat time improvement areas. Open source natural language processing libraries were used in this project, and were very effective in extracting events from textual data. An automated system was built to guide the drilling engineers in the planning phase of a well construction activity. Given a set of offset wells, the system combined both the time series data and textual data to arrive at these recommendations. Currently, there is no automated system that provides recommendations for well construction, and such tasks are still performed manually. The approach upon further refinement is expected to save 30 to 40 hours of the engineer’s time per well, and shorten learning curve by half to drive 20% performance improvement.